Graebert ARES vs. Onshape
Graebert ARES vs. Onshape
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARES | N/A | Graebert headquartered in Berlin offers the ARES suite of CAD applications. The product portfolio is anchored by the ARES “Trinity” of CAD Software for DWG-editing including ARES Commander for Windows, macOS and Linux computers, ARES Touch for Android and iOS smartphones and tablets and ARES Kudo, a full browser-based solution for DWG-editing in the Cloud. Graebert’s innovative approach is to combine these 3 solutions into a single ecosystem and subscription. | N/A | |
Onshape | N/A | Onshape is a cloud-native product development platform with integrated CAD, data management and analytics. Onshape aims to accelerate time to market and improve innovation by: 1) Access: Unlike file-based CAD which is on-premise only, Onshape enables remote access for designers and engineers from anywhere, and on any internet-connected device -including tablets and smart phones. 2) Collaboration: Onshape aims to eliminate the version control problems and blocking of file-based… | $1,500 per year per user |
Graebert ARES | Onshape | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | No dedicated hardware is required. Works on all web-connected devices including tablet, Chromebook, iPhone, Android. | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Graebert ARES | Onshape | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
Top Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
Graebert ARES | Onshape | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Onshape Score 9.0 out of 10 | ARCHICAD Score 8.8 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Onshape Score 9.0 out of 10 | ARCHICAD Score 8.8 out of 10 |
Enterprises | AutoCAD Score 8.8 out of 10 | AutoCAD Score 8.8 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Graebert ARES | Onshape | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.2 (61 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (2 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.9 (4 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.8 (38 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.2 (34 ratings) |
Graebert ARES | Onshape | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Pros | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Cons | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Likelihood to Renew | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Usability | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Support Rating | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Online Training | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Implementation Rating | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Alternatives Considered | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
Return on Investment | Graebert No answers on this topic | PTC |
ScreenShots |