HackerEarth Assessments vs. Wild Noodle

Here are some scenarios based on my experience where HackerEarth Assessments is well suited,

1. Straightforward tool and the learning curve is not at all steep so getting new employees onboarded on the tool is smooth.
2. Job Description related questionnaire library is conducive for quickly setting up
3. The coding platform is really good, it gives solid ide and amazing debugging abilities for the people being assessed
4. Their support of different types of assessments be it programs or MCQs is really flawless and quite impressive.

Basically I didn't find any such situations where it didn't perform according to what it is intended to. One thing I would just point out that their pricing strategy could be improved, like it is on the higher side for small scale companies

Incentivized

• we can design assessment tests using almost all programming languages.
• We can create customized test cases for a given assessment test.
• It is very economical to our organization.

Incentivized

• Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions.
• Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily.
• A transparent and publicly available pricing.

Compared to HackerRank, HackerEarth Assessments offers a similar coding assessment platform with a focus on tailored challenges for technical hiring. While both platforms assess coding skills, HackerEarth Assessments excels in remote evaluation and diversity outreach. There wasn't the much of a difference, but the UI of HackerEarth was nicer and we got a better price.

Incentivized

• Helps in understanding the coding skills of a candidate before an interview
• We don't have to explicitly set up a filtering round for the candidates
• Extremely User friendly

Incentivized