HeyReach is an automated LinkedIn outreach tool, used to automate 10+ step sequences using connection requests, messages, follow-ups, InMails, likes, and voice-notes. Outreach sequences can be customized with its workflow builder, and includes steps like automatic invites, messages, follow-ups, InMails, and like posting.
$79
per month per seat
UserGems
Score6.9 out of 10
N/A
UserGems is a pipeline generation platform for go-to-market teams. Its AI agents automatically surface high-intent buyers, prioritize them, and deploy personalized outbound and ABM to drive more pipeline at scale.
N/A
Pricing
HeyReach
UserGems
Editions & Modules
Per LinkedIn Seat
$79
per month per seat
Special Agency Offer
$799
per month up to 50 accounts & 5 workspaces
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HeyReach
UserGems
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
HeyReach
UserGems
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
7.6
2 Ratings
1% below category average
UserGems
-
Ratings
Lead nurturing automation
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data quality management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated follow-ups
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead segmentation and distribution
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management Integrations
Comparison of Lead Management Integrations features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
UserGems
-
Ratings
Integrations with CRMs
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with data storage tools
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with lead automation tools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion Rate Optimization
Comparison of Conversion Rate Optimization features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
8.5
2 Ratings
2% above category average
UserGems
-
Ratings
KPI analytics
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Drop-off analytics
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B tests
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form Building
Comparison of Form Building features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
6.4
2 Ratings
26% below category average
UserGems
-
Ratings
Conditional logic paths
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile responsiveness
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Date picker
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File upload
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.8
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Syndicated content
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Personalization
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Engagement data tracking
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
36% below category average
Ad campaign creation
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Display advertising
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Contextual advertising
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Social advertising
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
35% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of HeyReach and UserGems
Feature
HeyReach
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
32% below category average
3rd party intent signals
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Downstream intent signals
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Account identification
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of HeyReach and UserGems
We use it for all of our LinkedIn outbound internally, and it only takes one employee to oversee. We have 5 senders, so something that would have previously taken a lot of coordination and education (writing SOPs, training the rest of the team, overseeing that they follow the process daily/weekly/monthly, etc.) is now handled by one person in a few hours every week. If you compare it to legacy, enterprise tools–it's a no brainer. For a fraction of the cost, you are getting the same (or significantly more) value and features, no complicated annual contract that ties you down. Not to mention that they have incredible customer service and content. I habitually speak with the founding team, have asked for features and then seen them in the product within days/weeks. You can't get that at any of the competitors.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
- win back campaigns - low hanging fruit outreach, where the prospect is already familiar with our product - connecting us to leads who are directly within our ICP and based on a recent new hire or promotion, are likely to be in the market for a product like ours
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a very good tool especially the way they are improving themselves, as I have been using this platform before they even launched properly, & they are giving the requested features as well. The only thing is that as they scale, they need to have a better customer support team to handle the issues
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Because it's well automated, it's very easy to use for our scope. However, because it's so automated, at times I feel like I'm not getting the full picture. I also feel like there should be more training for admin in their actual platform. Even though they help us set up the automations, more training on using the platform might empower us to better understand how to get more out of the platform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Many of the competitors aren't listed in TrustRadius. But there are dozens more. They are either very enterprise or quite new (small challenger companies). HeyReach makes the enterprise options look wildly pricey and unreasonable, and they stand out from the other challengers by their approach, content, and roadmap. I've used so many tools and HeyReach has definitely made its way into our standard rotation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info