Hornetsecurity VM Backup vs. Qlik Replicate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Hornetsecurity VM Backup (formerly Altaro) is a backup and replication solution for Hyper-V and VMware virtual machines. VM Backup can manage large infrastructures, with the revamped backup repository providing long-term storage and more efficient use of disk space.
$59.80
per VM/per year
Qlik Replicate
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
Pricing
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Editions & Modules
Subscription License - Standard Edition
$59.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Edition
$73.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$89.20
per VM/per year
Perpetual License - Standard Edition
$595
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Edition
$695
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$875
per host
Free
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Considered Both Products
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Each of the products got its own strengths. For me, it is all about the customer, and about their requirements. Altaro is very good software, and I can get protected what I need to for our customers, and that is the most important part.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
I have not previously used any other VM backup solution prior to testing Altaro VM Backup.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
While there are other solutions on the market, we have stuck with Altaro because it is such a great value for the dollar.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
When we have looked for a VM backup solution we've tried some other competitors, even to backup just data and not all VM. We've tested Acronis backup that is a complete solution but more expensive and more complicated, we've also tried Nakivo but didn't convince us the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
We backup all VMs with both Altaro and Arcserve. Altaro is very powerful when it's time to back up and restore, but gets corrupted too often. Arcserve assures that we always have a safe copy of the VMs, but the backup and restore process is very slow. Can take days to restore a …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
  • Veeam seems like another excellent backup solution, and appears to have many similar features to Altaro VM Backup but also seemed more complicated to set up when I tried 5+ years ago.
  • Also, at the time, Veeam's licensing was very confusing where you needed to count CPU's on the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Altaro brings value to organizations looking at other platforms. It's definitely less expensive overall than Veeam, Datto or Infrascale. The recovery solution for Altaro is very good and reliable. Any organization looking at Veeam should consider Altaro as a potential …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Lower cost, same reliability, 24 hour support
Qlik Replicate
Chose Qlik Replicate
I found this as my lifesaver in terms of its efficacy and approachable to scale the streaming data from our ecommerce platform and analytics of data made much easier than compared to others. As it's partners with azure and other platforms which made our applications faster to …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate is fast and easy. ADF can do a wider variety of things
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was very cost-effective and easy to use.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik gave better perfoamnce
Chose Qlik Replicate
For different data bases source and target support, transformations, scalability, speed
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried to use Oracle GoldenGate for our Oracle source replication needs but, had too many issues with a number of our tables due to churn or size. Qlik Replicate had no issues. And, we can tune our tasks to not impact the source systems we are pulling from.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate / Attunity was able to be put on our server behind our firewall where with Fivetran would have required. Fivetran would also have required a different SQL server CDC setup. HVR was just as powerful if not more but was more costly and the user interface was not …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was more manageable, very intuitive and easy to understand than the other products like Striim. The learning curve is less with Qlik Replicate and the connectors for various sources was easier to plug and play.
Chose Qlik Replicate
The biggest advantage of Replicate in comparison to Fivetran is that we can run the application on-prem. This allows us to configure it precisely how we desire, avoid opening additional ports in our firewall, and monitor its resource consumption directly. That level of …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We replaced IBM’s Change Data Delivery software (Change Data capture specifically for Netezza) because it had a bad user interface, it was difficult to set up, and it was very hard to troubleshoot errors. We selected Qlik Replicate (then called Attunity CDC) because it has a …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We have not evaluated any other products in the last 3 years.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Attunity: Easy interface, relatively easy monitoring, zos support, budget friendly.
we choose Attunity.
At the same time we use AWS DMS for DB2, sqlserver -> aws services replications (cheaper). However because AWS DMS does not support db2 zos we use Attunity for db2 zos …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Far less complex to manage
Chose Qlik Replicate
Simple to do one-to-one copy and very reliable, as other tools a little complex in setting up the pipelines and scheduling parts. Very simple to connect to the SFTP locations and easy to download them as well.
Chose Qlik Replicate
You need to have expertise knowledge to design and develop data using visual studio. But you can design a data flow with minimum experience. In addition to that QLIK has a better performance. It enables you to replicate a large volume of data with minimum latency. The …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We helped attunity (prior owners if replicate) build out new features and worked through bugs with them. Their product was not great when we originally started but there were no other solutions in the market except for Golden Gate which had a hefty price tag associated with it.
Chose Qlik Replicate
SSIS lacks real time replication and the only place where it can beat SSIS.
Additionally, has more end point connectors than SSIS,
Chose Qlik Replicate
Both of these work with API's and services, Qlik Replicate does not.
Chose Qlik Replicate
We're still evaluating, but so far Replicate is easier to set up than HVR. I'm not involved with the FiveTran evaluation.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate's power is in its simple 1:1 copying of database tables and architecture and maintaining a near real-time copy of that database. Talend and SSIS are different tools and more for custom ETL's that require various steps to connect to SFTP or download files. …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried MIMIX, SQL SSIS and Veeam but our team found Qlik Replicate had an advantage over all these three in terms of speed, UI, and ease of maintenance.
Chose Qlik Replicate
I have not evaluated any other competing products. Qlik Replicate was the first product we selected for the data lake three years ago, and we have stayed with it ever since.
Features
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.5
Ratings
10% above category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Universal recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hornetsecurity VM BackupQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
Altaro VM Backup is great if you have 1 or 2 VMs that aren't backed up by any other means. I initially had some issues with setting it up so it backed up to a NAS, and sometimes the host wouldn't sync to the client. There probably wouldn't be an issue if the host system is the backup location. The interface and configuration were pretty intuitive and gave you a lot of information on the status of your backups.
Read full review
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fast and simple setup. I didn't need to read through ANY documentation to set up and have a backup running.
  • Easy and cost-effective licensing. I didn't need to count CPU's or VM's or other random facts to work out my licensing. Just how many hosts, and then one of 3 feature levels of which two have unlimited VM licensing. Hosts x Feature Set = Cost.
  • Easy Restores. Backing up is one thing, but restoring and having confidence in the restore is another. It just works, simple and effective.
  • Help is easy to find if you need it. From within the app, it gives you options of email, phone, and live chat, which is usually available even with odd time zones in play.
Read full review
  • Qlik Replicate brought a great experience with respect to the ease of implementation and great UI. We had a software that was a blackbox for the team and was very hard to maintain. Qlik Replicate implementation helped us avoid dependency on one resource.
  • Global transformation and in-built functions are what I like in our project.
  • You can customize the conversion/transformation using a JSON file generated by Qlik Replicate, and it is very convenient.
Read full review
Cons
  • More cloud-based storage options. Currently, only Azure is supported, which is excellent, but it would be good to have AWS and Google storage options too.
  • It would be AWESOME if they could do a restore from Azure cloud direct to an Azure VM instance. Currently, you need to set up an Azure VM machine with nested Hyper-V, install Altaro on that, and then restore into a nested VM, this gets crazy expensive.
  • Better notification of errors, or more around having a threshold, so if it misses one backup of a constant backup that happens every 5 minutes but recovers at the 10 minutes back, it is ok. Just think it needs to identify significant or long-running issues better than the occasional little issues.
Read full review
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It simply works and it is making our lives easier. The renewal process is also really good
Read full review
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
Usability
A lot of people in the technical industry deliver what I would call snack crackle pop topics, where the software gets over complicated, and they drown people in all the "fancy" features. Altaro, from my point of view" has designed the software to be super usable, easy to implement, as well as support. It is really one of the best designs
Read full review
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Support Rating
One of the most important benefits of the Altaro HyperV backup solution is the support. From the free edition, you're able to chat with the support that can assist you in a remote session an find a quick solution that solves the issue. It is always available. The email support is also.
Read full review
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Altaro has really designed their product so well that you can honestly implement this within a couple of minutes
Read full review
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for no apparent reason. In the handful of times I have needed support, they were helpful and straight-forward.
Read full review
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Restoring our primary ERP VM has already saved many hours of rebuilding from data backups, so that in itself already gave us an excellent ROI for having Altaro running.
  • The quick and easy setup also makes sense for a fast ROI as we didn't need to spend much time or effort in its set up.
  • Lastly, any other restores we have done for retrieving files or testing backups were so simple and easy to do that the process didn't take long and saved us time and cost.
Read full review
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of