HPE Data Fabric vs. IBM watsonx.data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Data Fabric
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
HPE Data Fabric (formerly MapR, acquired by HPE in 2019) is a software-defined datastore and file system that simplifies data management and analytics by unifying data across core, edge, and multicloud sources into a single platform.N/A
IBM watsonx.data
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Watsonx.data is presented as an open, hybrid and governed data store that makes it possible for enterprises to scale analytics and AI with a fit-for-purpose data store, built on an open lakehouse architecture, supported by querying, governance and open data formats to access and share data.N/A
Pricing
HPE Data FabricIBM watsonx.data
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE Data FabricIBM watsonx.data
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE Data FabricIBM watsonx.data
User Ratings
HPE Data FabricIBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(4 ratings)
8.8
(32 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(10 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE Data FabricIBM watsonx.data
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
MapR is more well-suited for people who know what they are doing. I consider MapR the Hadoop distribution professionals use.
Read full review
IBM
Real-time transaction processing (both reads and writes) is where DataStax Enterprise shines. It's very fast with linear scalability should more resources be needed. Additional nodes are added very easily. DataStax Enterprise on its own (without Solr or Spark enabled) isn't well suited for long complicated reports. The data model doesn't support joining multiple tables together which is common in BI reporting.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • MapR had very fast I/O throughput. The write speed was several times faster than what we could achieve with the other Hadoop vendors (Cloudera and Hortonworks). This is because MapR does not use HDFS, which is essentially a "meta filesystem". HDFS is built on top of the filesystem provided by the OS. MapR has their filesystem called MapR-FS, which is a true filesystem and accesses the raw disk drives.
  • The MapR filesystem is very easy to integrate with other Linux filesystems. When working with HDFS from Apache Hadoop, you usually have to use either the HDFS API or various Hadoop/HDFS command line utilities to interact with HDFS. You cannot use command line utilities native to the host operation system, which is usually Linux. At least, it is not easily done without setting up NFS, gateways, etc. With MapR-FS, you can mount the filesystem within Linux and use the standard Unix commands to manipulate files.
  • The HBase distribution provided by MapR is very similar to the Apache HBase distribution. Cloudera and Hortonworks add GUIs and other various tools on top of their HBase distributions. The MapR HBase distribution is very similar to the Apache distribution, which is nice if you are more accustomed to using Apache HBase.
Read full review
IBM
  • Datastax Cassandra provides high availability and good performance for a database. It is built on top of open source Apache Cassandra so you can always somewhat understand the internal functioning and why.
  • Datastax Cassandra is fairly simple to start using, you can install/setup your cluster and be productive in 1 day.
  • Datastax Cassandra provides a lot of good detailed documentation, and when starting, the detailed free videos on the Datastax site and documentation are very helpful.
  • Datastax Enterprise Edition of Cassandra provides more tools, good support, and quick response SLA for enterprise business support.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • It takes time to get latest versions of Apache ecosystem tools released as it has to be adapted.
  • When you have issues related to Mapr-FS or Mapr Tables, its hard to figure them out by ourselves.
  • Sometime new ecosystem tools versions are released without proper QA.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration complexity with Security Tools while watsonx.Data is well-suited for native tools, but integration with third-party security tools requires custom connectors or manual ETL pipelines. which leads to an increase in setup time.
  • User interface and query time can be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
As an open source technology Cassandra can be readily used with or without any commercial support. DataStax provides value-added services and features, and in the end it is up to individual situations to strike a balance between the desirability of such support/service versus the associated cost.
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
DataStax has a good community built around it and has amazing scalability options. Though the initial setup is a bit costly, in the long run, it makes up for it. It also has powerful monitoring tools and a clean UI.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
good recovery features
Read full review
Performance
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
scalable product
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
We have had a few situations where we caused an outage or something has gone wrong and we are able to get a support person to offer live help within minutes. The escalation process is excellent - the best I've seen - and the support team is incredibly strong. Outside of emergencies, the team is very helpful with general questions and working through data model exercises and the subscription I believe still comes with some hours to help get the data model reviewed.
Read full review
Online Training
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
easy to follow documentation, support is there when needed
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
use saas service
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
I don't believe there is as much support for MapR yet compared to other more widely known products.
Read full review
IBM
Snowflake is a more mature, simpler to use product but watsonx.data has a more open architecture and it better for hybrid cloud environments. In addition, watsonx.data is part of an entire watsonx platform that offers many advantages over is closest competitors. The single biggest reason though is the ability to leverage data where it lives vs. forcing a lot of data movement/warehousing 1st.
Read full review
Scalability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
IBM
cognos integration works great
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Increased employee efficiency for sure. Our clients have various levels of expertise in their deployment and user teams, and we never receive complaints about MapR.
  • MapR is used by one of our financial services clients who uses it for fraud detection and user pattern analysis. They are able to turn around data much faster than they previously had with in-house applications
Read full review
IBM
  • for one automation project, we managed to cut cloud storage costs by a third through IBM watsonx.data's lakehouse optimization
  • data integration projects have had a 20 % reduction in turnaround times. Can only imagine how that will improve with the Claude partnership
Read full review
ScreenShots