HPE Morpheus vs. SUSE Rancher

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Morpheus
Score 4.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
HPE Morpheus Enterprise is a self-service engine that provides enterprise agility and control, letting users enable on-prem private clouds, centralize public cloud access, and change orchestration with cost analytics, governance policy, and automation.N/A
SUSE Rancher
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost…
$7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Pricing
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription license
7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Standard Subscription
11,234.99
per year 10 nodes
Priority Subscription
30,514.99
per year 10 nodes
Management Server Priority Subscription
41,830.99
per year 1 instance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Features
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
HPE Morpheus
9.1
2 Ratings
4% above category average
SUSE Rancher
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration9.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
HPE Morpheus
-
Ratings
SUSE Rancher
7.5
7 Ratings
8% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.77 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings7.47 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings6.76 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.66 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings6.56 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.7
(17 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(2 ratings)
6.8
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE MorpheusSUSE Rancher
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
Morpheus is well suited for those who want to have a management pane of glass that will allow you to see what you are consuming and how you are consuming it. It also ties into many other types of software and the development team seems to be constantly improving the product. That lends it to being a bit complicated. If you want something easy to set up, this isn't your product.
Read full review
SUSE
SUSE Rancher as a management tool becomes useful on a larger scale. Small deployments not so much. If someone also requires Kubernetes capacity or storage, Rancher is an excellent choice. Also, without Kubernetes' skills, it is unlikely that Rancher deployment is going to be a success. Then again if someone else is managing your Kubernetes capacity, setting up the software's capacity will yield greater control. Rancher is not a very integrated solution similar to others in the market.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Copious native 3rd party integrations.
  • Ties into multiple public and private clouds for single management plane.
  • True multi-tenancy.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Public and private cloud infrastructure providers based on K8s CAPI
  • REST API that can be used to integrate company services with Rancher
  • GUI that is easy to learn and use in daily operations
  • Builtin GitOps automation solution based on Fleet project
  • It is fully open source
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • More dashboard/visualization capabilities
Read full review
SUSE
  • No possibility to snapshot Projects. You can snapshot and restore the whole Kubernetes cluster, but not a Project or Namespace. For this, you have to use external tools.
  • You cannot detach the Rancher-created Kubernetes clusters from Rancher management.
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
SUSE
Overall it deserves an 8 out of 10. The platform is very easy to use as long as the UI is stable. We have had a few buggy versions in the past. However the CLI is excellent and the platform is simple to manage and maintain. It is easy to deploy and offer for company wide use which increases utilization and ROI.
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
We have always been able to reach the support organization at Morpheus on the rare event we needed them. They have been nothing but helpful.
Read full review
SUSE
The documentation is quite complete and there is a very active community that is willing to collaborate and answer questions for those who are just starting out.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
We previously were using VRA. VRA, while some of the new versions look interesting is hard for both administration as well as end user consumption.
Read full review
SUSE
We started using SUSE Rancher in the early days and spent a large amount of time getting to know and love it. This was before the days of some of the likes of Amazon Web Services who may now provide a cheaper but less feature-rich alternative to SUSE Rancher, however we have yet to explore this.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
No answers on this topic
SUSE
The investment for small environments is quite significant. There has to be a compelling case to enhance the areas where SUSE Rancher brings in value to make such a financial leap. There is also a free version to test the value propositions, which will help support the user's buying decisions. More clusters, more volume, more tasks and more complexity in the environment equals more value that Rancher can provide.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Excellent monitoring tool
Read full review
SUSE
  • Shortens "Time-to-Market" factor for new business applications or implementing new functionalities. From 1 to 50 microservices-based business applications in 6 years.
  • 24/7 availability, generates more money. There are many infrastructure components that are regularly powered-off for maintenance or upgrade, bur we rarely are turning off our downstream Kubernetes clusters where our business applications lives.
  • Single Point of Contact with platform maintenance and development Team, eases implementation of new business applications
Read full review
ScreenShots

HPE Morpheus Screenshots

Screenshot of Morpheus makes it easy to see all your vital information in a single pane of glass, including provisioning and monitoring.Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of