Hugging Face vs. IBM watsonx.ai

If an organisation has more access to data and have access to high end computers like GPUs it’s recommended to use Hugging face as it will give better accuracy than any other models. If an organisation having less data and has less access to GPUsis looking for decent performance then traditional algorithms are more appropriate than hugging face

Incentivized

I have built a code accelerator tool for one of the IBM product implementation. Although there was a heavy lifting at the start to train the model on specifics of the packaged solution library and ways of working; the efficacy of the model is astounding. Having said that, watsonx.ai is very well suited for customer service automation, healthcare data analytics, financial fraud detection, and sentiment analysis kind of projects. The Watsonx.ai look and feel is little confusing but I understand over a period of time , it will improve dramatically as well. I do feel that Watsonx.ai has certain limitations from cross-platform deployment flexibility. If an organization is deeply invested in a multi-cloud environment, Watson's integration on other cloud platforms may not be seamless comported to other AI platforms.

Incentivized

• Model APIs
• Hugging Face Spaces for deploying demo apps
• Latest updated models available easily
• Vast support for language parsing and other relevant tasks

Incentivized

• Transcription
• analysis of feelings
• risk analysis
• fraud analysis
• creating insights
• Transcrição
• analise dos sentimentos
• análise de riscos
• análise de fraudes
• criação de insights

Incentivized

• Most of the Hugging face models are of big size, hence difficult to work if there is no access to high computational system like GPU.
• It’s good to have some visualization tool in hugging face for viewing model architecture.
• I recommend to implement hugging face lite version so that it can run on any system with less specifications.

Incentivized

• Some members of the team may also find it difficult to learn and use IBM watsonx.ai.
• It can be long, hence may raise the operation cost
• The integration of IBM watsonx.ai with other systems can be cumbersome as well as require technical help

Incentivized

I needed some time to understand the different parts of the web UI. It was slightly overwhelming in the beginning. However, after some time, it made sense, and I like the UI now. In terms of functionality, there are many useful features that make your life easy, like jumping to a section and giving me a deployment space to deploy my models easily.

Incentivized

There are some other services offer similar capacity as to Hugging Face, but not entirely the same. For example, amazon web services have a machine learning service called Comprehend, which offer a set of easy to use APIs to do machine translation and entity recognition and some other common NLP use case.

Incentivized

I think that the user interface is where IBM watsonx.ai shines the most compared to competitors. There is a visual tool to build AI pipelines in a very easy and instinctive way, that anybody can master in no time I think.

Incentivized

• Hugging Face is cost and time saving.
• Pay is less, you pay what you use, doesn't affect much.
• Overall positive impact on business.

Incentivized

• Excellent customer service and prompt resolution of issues.
• Simple to use and access.
• Works with a many systems, such as websites, messaging apps and mobile apps.
• Gives the best protection to keep private data safe.

Incentivized