IBM Cloud Functions vs. Oracle Application Container Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Functions
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Functions is a PaaS platform based on Apache OpenWhisk. With it, developers write code (“actions”) that respond to external events. Actions are hosted, executed, and scaled on demand based on the number of events coming in. No servers or infrastructure to provision and manage.
$0
per second of execution
Oracle Application Container Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Application Container Cloud, a PaaS supporting the development of cloud native, 12-factor applications on a modern polyglot platform with Java EE, Java SE, Node.js, PHP, Python, Ruby, GO and .NET.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Editions & Modules
Basic Cloud Functions Rate
$0.00017
per second of execution
API Gateway Rate
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Functions
-
Ratings
Oracle Application Container Cloud
5.0
1 Ratings
48% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
3.0
(7 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud FunctionsOracle Application Container Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Cloud Functions [is] not the worse product on the IBM cloud. I decided to write this review as I thought it would be balanced. I would still use functions to set up a serverless architecture where execution time is pretty quick and the code is relatively simple. I wouldn't use IBM Cloud Functions for async calls obviously, as costs could be higher. The functions documentation is lacking in terms of CI/CD, and there are unexplainable errors occurring - like the network connection that I mentioned. So I wouldn't just rely on IBM Cloud Functions too much for the entire system, but make sure it's diversified.
Read full review
Oracle
For how it is used within the organization it is perfectly fine. We use it for benefits, salary, and vacation tracking. It does make it easy to find your information within the system and make changes.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Great substitute for a simple API calls to run non-complicated code.
  • Easy way to run Python/Java/Javascript to get something done.
  • File validation.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Ease of use.
  • User-friendly.
  • Sleek layout.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Billing can be a hassle, not the most responsive customer service/support team
  • Handles & executes most functionalities, but other platforms offer more scalability if you're seeking consistent and stable growth
Read full review
Oracle
  • Fewer tabs.
  • More direct access to information.
  • More insight into where approvals are within the system.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I am not a part of the team that would make this decision but as far as I know they are happy with the platform and how it performs.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Incredibly easy to use and learn how to use. The interface is extremely easy to use.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The team who helps with the issue is very helpful when resolving the issue and usually can handle it in a very timely manner.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The system is very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
  • ICF is a lightweight service and does not require runtime configurations
  • Scalable on demand and hence there is no need to pay for runtime costs
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It directly affected our expenses since we do not need to deploy and maintain a set of separate applications.
  • It allowed us to pay for only the amount of time cloud functions run.
  • It saved on maintenance and monitoring of the applications it replaced.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Employee Empowerment
  • Reduced lagtime
  • Connects correct people to correct situations
Read full review
ScreenShots