IBM Confluent vs. Microsoft BI (MSBI)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
![]() Microsoft BI (MSBI) | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing. | $14 per month per user |
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 15 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 15 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 15 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI Standard Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ad-hoc Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Report Output and Scheduling |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data Discovery and Visualization |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Access Control and Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mobile Capabilities |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Cyfe Score4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Sisense Score6.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.9 |
| Availability | - | 9.5 |
| Performance | - | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| In-Person Training | - | 6.9 |
| Online Training | - | 8.5 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.6 |
| Configurability | - | 10.0 |
| Data Sharing and Collaboration | - | 8.5 |
| Data Sources | - | 8.4 |
| IBM Confluent | Microsoft BI (MSBI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Support Rating |
| ![]()
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots |









