IBM Confluent vs. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is optimized for analytic workloads, including data marts, data warehouses, data lakes, and data lakehouses. With Autonomous Data Warehouse, data scientists, business analysts, and nonexperts can discover business insights using data of any size and type. The solution is built for the cloud and optimized using Oracle Exadata. | N/A |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Oracle Exadata Score9.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



