IBM Guardium is IBM's data security posture management solution, that aims to offer organizations comprehensive visibility, actionable insights and real-time controls to help users comply with regulations, preserve privacy and secure sensitive data no matter where it is stored.
N/A
Imperva Data Security
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Imperva Data Security (formerly SecureSphere for Data) is an enterprise application and file security suite, combining database and file security management and monitoring under its database.
N/A
Symantec Data Center Security
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Docker containers make it easy to develop, deploy, and deliver applications where containers can be deployed and brought
down in a matter of seconds. This flexibility makes it very useful for DevOps to automate deployment of containers. Symantec
Data Center Security: Server Advanced provides agent-less Docker container protection that allows you to achieve the
performance benefits of Docker without sacrificing security. Full application control enables administrator privilege de…
N/A
Pricing
IBM Guardium
Imperva Data Security
Symantec Data Center Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Guardium
Imperva Data Security
Symantec Data Center Security
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing is dependent based on data source environment.
If I compare Imperva to IBM Guardium, I could define three very important differentiators. The first is that IBM Guardium has a much more advanced suite of analytical investigation and risk detection tools than Imperva, which allows for a turnkey solution with IBM Guardium …
When evaluating data security and activity monitoring solutions, we compared IBM Guardium against several leading platforms, including Imperva SecureSphere, Oracle Audit Vault, and native database auditing tools. While each offered basic monitoring and compliance capabilities, …
Guardium excels in its broad data protection and compliance monitoring, while Imperva offers good cloud data security. Guardium seems to be a much more robust platform. IBM is also investing heavily in AI for Guardium.
IBM Guardium is the most popular option. IBM has a stronger brand name that conveys more trust.Technically, the Thales solution was more focused on encryption than on data monitoring.
first of all, these products having all the capability but what is best suited for our environment we selected that as our primary goal to get monitor all the database activity then we should have its Realtime alerts and notification then again it should be in budget and …
IBM Security Guardium is better with its compatibility and integration methods and compatibility matrix, the other products don't cover all the database motors that IBM Guardium can do, regarding to brand, versions and editions of the database motors, IBM support and licensing …
Especially cost, we use both products, but cost, we use Imperva a lot and other databases, but cloud is where we are really looking for a new differentiator. That's where I would say we still don't have anybody in that space here. Especially it can identify the risks related to …
Well, like I say, there's a couple out there that do this kind of thing as well. So TRX being one of the ones that do something in this space too. Also very good product. I don't think there's a lot between them to be honest. We have IBM as a partner in my organization so they …
It checks many boxes when it comes to security. It allows you to see all the DB activity that goes on, report on it, and send it to SIEM. The analytics part extends this product even more. The investigation dashboard makes it easier to find outliers or specifics without running queries or reports.
Compliance to audits and HiTrust certification. It is key in ensuring that our audits are completed in a timely manner with no repeats of data requests and that we also are HiTrust certified at our organization. Personally while the data obfuscation is available I am not sure I would fully trust that the data is completely sanitized if need be. It's not against the Imperva product but more of issue of data being used.
It is a perfect system to detect problems that we do not see manually, it is light, with a very simple learning curve and with great protection of our data, we will use it forever.
It might look complex in the beginning but once you get hold of it by going through all of the documentation then it seems to be very smooth. The configuration is comparatively easy and the user can understand it on their own without any external help. The overall learning curve is Ok.
There has been great support coming from IBM. It is easy to use and a great way to keep our data secure. I would recommend this to other possible users and if I were to move companies, I would recommend we use this there too. Thank you
If I compare Imperva to IBM Guardium, I could define three very important differentiators. The first is that IBM Guardium has a much more advanced suite of analytical investigation and risk detection tools than Imperva, which allows for a turnkey solution with IBM Guardium Data Protection product, allowing for greater efficiency in incident detection and response to the same threats. The second differentiator is support for monitoring unstructured data, such as Word files, PowerPoint files, Excel files, PDF files, among others, stored in a Windows or Linux file server, data stored in SharePoint, and finally, data stored on a NAS. Imperva lacks this feature for monitoring unstructured data, so IBM Guardium Data Protection is the winner and helps organizations cover the entire overall scope of data repositories. And finally, I'd like to emphasize support and compatibility for relational databases, DBaaS, and market databases, which I've seen Imperva lack coverage for. IBM Guardium has greater monitoring and protection coverage for databases, whether relational or non-relational, cloud database services, and even mainframes with indexed file systems.