IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. IBM StoredIQ Suite

Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.

IBM StoredIQ is great if you have a lot of unstructured data and you need to scan that all, especially for GDPR reasons.

Incentivized

• IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
• It also can process big data , unstuctured data
• It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems

Incentivized

• Search for any data.
• Processes any type of files.
• OCR works great.

Incentivized

• I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
• Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
• It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.

Incentivized

• Adding workstations to scan is too complicated.
• Server hardware requirements are quite big.
• Not so user-friendly interface.

Incentivized

• Scale of implementation
• IBM techsupport

Incentivized

Great support from IBM whenever we have requested it

Incentivized

DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS

IBM StoredIQ has better features and pricing in comparison to Varonis

Incentivized

• Productivity of the development of integration processes.
• Better documentation and governance.
• Reduce training costs of various technologies.

• As the solution was not cheap, we tend to decrease the amount of unused data.
• Hopefully by using this tool we will avoid any GDPR fines.

Incentivized