IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM InfoSphere Optim | Score4 out of 10 | N/A | IBM InfoSphere® Optim™ solutions manage data from requirements to retirement, to improve governance across applications, databases and platforms by managing data properly, enabling organizations to support business goals with less risk. | N/A |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| IBM InfoSphere Optim | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM InfoSphere Optim | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| IBM InfoSphere Optim | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 5.3 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.9 |
| IBM InfoSphere Optim | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |



