TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. National Instruments SystemLink

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM DevOps Test UI

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AAutomated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A

    SystemLink

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ANational Instruments headquartered in Austin offers SystemLink, a software platform for managing system configurationt tasks, device management, software deployment, to improve system uptime and performance.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM DevOps Test UISystemLink
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM DevOps Test UISystemLink
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    IBM DevOps Test UISystemLink
    Small Businesses
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OpenText UFT One
    Score8 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM DevOps Test UISystemLink
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM DevOps Test UISystemLink
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NI (National Instruments)
    There are definitely scenarios where NI SystemLink will be useful but just didn't work out well for us. I needed to be able to replace an EXE file on a computer with a new EXE to do the upgrades but I was not able to do that through SystemLink. You had to work with packages in order to perform this and I didn't want to revamp my distribution plan. We also didn't need to do any asset management or calibration documentation through SystemLink. I was excited about being able to view data from the test stations through a browser but our engineers need historical data available and everything resets to a live view when you click back to the UI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
    • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
    • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NI (National Instruments)
    • Setup
    • User Interface
    • LabVIEW Integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
    • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
    • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NI (National Instruments)
    • Licensing
    • Not able to see data from all test stations on one UI
    • Lack of data history
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NI (National Instruments)
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
    • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NI (National Instruments)
    • Availability to monitor multiple test stations remotely
    • Was quick to integrate into existing LabVIEW codebase
    • Ultimately did not justify the licensing cost for the benefit
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots