IBM DevOps Test UI vs. NetStorm

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
NetStorm
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Cavisson’s NetStorm is a performance testing and capacity analysis appliance. It is a load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its technology handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. The vendor says NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues early in the application life cycle. Additionally, the vendor says what makes…N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTo get started with NetStorm, email us at sales@cavisson.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.4 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UINetStorm
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Read full review
Cavisson Systems
[NetStorm] is well suited for an enterprise use, we are smaller business and it is not as suitable but we still use it.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Read full review
Cavisson Systems
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Read full review
Cavisson Systems
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Read full review
Cavisson Systems
We have not really used any other products like this.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Read full review
Cavisson Systems
  • Helps with performance
  • Easy load testing
  • Saves time and money
Read full review
ScreenShots

NetStorm Screenshots

Screenshot of Home page showing Active Alerts, CPU usage, Heap Usage Memory and other DetailsScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Compare two Test casesScreenshot of Dashboard with highlighted metricesScreenshot of Scenario Design