TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Security QRadar EDR

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users…N/A

    Kaspersky Endpoint Security

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AKaspersky Small Office Security (formerly Kaspersky Work Space Security) is antivirus / endpoint security software from Russian company Kaspersky.

    $29.99

    per month

    Pricing
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essential Suite
    $29.99
    per month
    Advanced Suite
    $39.99
    per month
    Premium Suite
    $44.99
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    86%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of IBM Security QRadar EDR and Kaspersky Endpoint Security
    Feature
    IBM Security QRadar EDR
    7.5
    10 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Kaspersky Endpoint Security
    9.3
    15 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology7.39 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.410 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Centralized Management7.310 Ratings9.514 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support7.39 Ratings9.511 Ratings
    Infection Remediation7.310 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Malware Detection8.110 Ratings10.015 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Small Businesses
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (11 ratings)
    9.0
    (28 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Security QRadar EDRKaspersky Endpoint Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Security QRadaar EDR provides all the security features at one place with a reasonable price. Though for smaller organizations, the price may be quite high. Plus since it can detect threats and malwares in real time, every business should try them out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    I think Kaspersky is well suited for large and small companies. Larger companies can take advantage of the KSC (Kaspersky Security Center) servers to help manage a large network. The KSC has many good features to help monitor the health of the organization. It does a good job with updating and deploying remotely. It has inventory features, and can even deploy non-Kaspersky software packages uploaded to the center. KSC can become a source of good information about [your] network that can be seen at a glance. IT departments are normally smaller than they need to be. KSC helps with larger and smaller companies because of this. A small company would appreciate the amount of information and management that can be done through KSC without needing extra help. If the company is small enough that they don't have servers on-site, there is a cloud version. I have not used that to know how it differs from the local KSC.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Detect known and unknown endpoint security threats
    • Remediate these threats near real time
    • Automation in threat detection
    • Threat attack attack visualization storyboards
    • Alert management authomation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • The Security Center is laid out very well and makes it easy to install and manage the client endpoint protection on servers and workstations.
    • The way security policies are defined and managed is very easy to understand.
    • The client programs seem to be lighter and smaller on the client systems than others I have used in the past. Using fewer resources is always an advantage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • use AI to review previous false negatives that contributed wrongly in the AI suggestion on the follow alerts
    • easily run a script based on values from an hash, ips, path inside the boxes on the behavioral tree
    • apply the remediation to a range of endpoint instead to only the endpoint of the current alert
    • use ajax for example to update the alert page automatically while actions are happening
    • for api have profiles that allow only get actions, or just post on some actions
    • create users in bulk
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • The PC imaging tools are difficult to set up and use
    • Device Encryption tools are getting better, but are difficult to manage.
    • The policies are powerful, but could be broken up. More help can be provided in what the policy element does within the policy setup
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    The product is stable and accurate in detecting security threats. There are very few or no false positives in detecting security threats or unusual behavior and has very sharp heuristics. The product does the job very well including saving us money in getting 3rd party patch management tools as the business is already using Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager which is Microsoft product specific and the product patches these third party products e.g Adobe Flash Player
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    I will give Kaspersky a score of 9 out of 10 for scalability, as it allows businesses to easily expand their security infrastructure. This means it won't cost them a lot to add further protection and security. It won't also require them to purchase other hardware and services for their required protection.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    I've used the on-premise server. I've only experienced one time that we couldn't open the console, and that was a server issue. It seems to be a dependable solution. It's there, and it's stable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    Users don't notice any slowdown with the antivirus running on their systems. There have been issues when the systems have missed a scheduled scan, and it was checked to run at [a] first available time, they will start a full scan at startup. This has caused some lag. Normally there are also some issues with the workstation, but it is something to note.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    I give the maximum grade because we have no complaints; we never had any failure, serious error, and serious threat to the company. All of its features work very well. The great advantage of having a product supported by an industry-leading security company is that regularly updated security protocols will protect the system against all emerging threats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    Make sure to provide awareness campaigns on changes that will be implemented and WHY the business is doing it and the benefits reaped. Benefits reaped is very important for the justification of why things have to change and emphasizing the importance of security. This will reduce user disgruntlement and total bitterness on use of their workstation or laptop
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Bitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints. bit the IBM provides a vast support and always there to guide when in need With the majority of our users working in hybrid mode we needed a strong security control that could provide top-class protection with the minimum amount of False Positives (and, of course, of True Positives).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    Kaspersky is a leader in endpoint protection, but its ties to potential adversaries are unsettling. Kaspersky has a great threat research team and quickly identifies malicious software and its signature. Its web-based protection is also top notch. This is a great product but as with everything has its place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Kaspersky Lab
    You can create groups and create different policies for each group. You can customize many parts of the software before it is deployed. You can create different tasks and schedules based on the groups. It is customizable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • NOCs and SOCs heavily use IBM Security QRadar EDR and IBM Security QRadar EDR reduced labor costs to identify endpoint security threats and the treat remediation
    • IBM Security QRadar EDR offers a consistent approach to endpoint threat identification and resolution, reduces enterprise security operations support costs
    • In general, IBM Security QRadar EDR enhances enterprise security posture
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • It reduced the incidents of infections and so reduced the efforts needed by the IT department to mitigate problems.
    • It made it difficult to manage the security of our growing mobile user base due to infrequent contact with our on-premise management server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots

    Screenshot of Behavioral tree: 
A behavioral tree provides full alert and attack visibility.Screenshot of Behavioral tree storyline: 
A visual storyline is automatically created as an attack unfolds, including mapping to MITRE ATT&CK, for full visibility.Screenshot of Cyber Assistant alerts: 
The Cyber Assistant, an AI-powered alert management system, can autonomously handle alerts, reducing analysts’ workloads.Screenshot of Cyber Assistant recommends:
The Cyber Assistant learns from analyst decisions, then retains the intellectual capital and learned behaviors to make recommendations and help reduce false positives.Screenshot of Custom detection strategies: 
Detection Strategy (DeStra) scripting allows users to build custom detection strategies — beyond preconfigured models — to address compliance or company-specific requirements without the need to reboot the endpoint.