Did not provide the level of remote endpoint management we needed for a growing mobile workforce
Overall Satisfaction with Kaspersky Endpoint Security
We used this solution on all of our company PCs and servers for at least three years. We used it to provide anti-virus and network protection to our endpoints. As of February 2019, we no longer use this solution.
Pros
- Easy to schedule routine scans of systems.
- Offers a way to selectively scan specific file(s) on-demand.
- Provides a central management server to monitor and control endpoint deployment and maintenance.
Cons
- In our installation, the management server was on our LAN. This made it difficult to manage those devices that did not "check-in" very often. This resulted in some systems' information to be out-dated in the console.
- There is not a way to view live security events on an endpoint. We would often learn from the user of the endpoint that they were observing an issue.
- When an endpoint was relocated to a different network e.g. a home vs. corporate network, the switching of network policies not always went as expected resulting in the enforcement of the incorrect policy.
- It reduced the incidents of infections and so reduced the efforts needed by the IT department to mitigate problems.
- It made it difficult to manage the security of our growing mobile user base due to infrequent contact with our on-premise management server.
At the time, we thought its centralized management and highly-rated anti-virus detection capabilities stood out above the other solutions we reviewed.
Do you think Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Kaspersky Endpoint Security's feature set?
No
Did Kaspersky Endpoint Security live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Kaspersky Endpoint Security go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Kaspersky Endpoint Security again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation