IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. SecureLink Enterprise Access
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
SecureLink Enterprise Access | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | SecureLink is a platform for remote support in regulated industries. Enterprise software vendors use SecureLink to deliver remote support and services. Hospitals, banks, casinos and other regulated entities use SecureLink to authenticate, control and audit remote access for their vendors, business associates and other 3rd parties. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.6 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | SecureLink Enterprise Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |








