TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM SPSS Statistics

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ASPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. It is now officially named "IBM SPSS Statistics". Companion products in the same family are used for survey authoring and deployment (IBM SPSS Data Collection), data mining (IBM SPSS Modeler), text analytics, and collaboration and deployment (batch and automated scoring services).

    $105

    per month per user

    Intellect QMS

    Score8.1 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Intellect provides a flexible enterprise Quality Management Software (eQMS) solution and platform designed to meet any FDA and ISO compliance requirements, as well as digital transformation goals. Built on the Intellect Compliance Platform, Intellect's no-code platform, Intellect offers what they describe as the most configurable eQMS solution in the industry. Intellect's eQMS is a centralized and integrated solution to manage quality needs, today and tomorrow. The vendor boasts over 19…N/A
    Pricing
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Editions & Modules
    Base
    USD 3,830
    one-time fee per user
    Standard
    USD 8,440
    one-time fee per user
    Professional
    USD 16,900
    one-time fee per user
    Premium
    USD 25,200
    one-time fee per user
    Monthly subscription
    USD 105
    per month per user
    Annual subscription
    USD 1,188.00
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Intellect is available on a subscription basis, with pricing dependent on the number of users.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Intellect
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    49 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    42 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    51 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    34 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    35 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Alteryx Platform
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (116 ratings)
    8.1
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (23 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.4
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.7
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM SPSS StatisticsIntellect QMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM SPSS Statistics is well suited for pretty much any data analytic scenario. It can handle extremely complex and large-scale datasets with ease. It especially shines if you have to do any kind of analyses that involve significance testing. Being able to do any number of significance tests (i.e., t-tests, chi-square, ANOVAs, etc.) right inside the tool is very valuable. The only scenario I would say it is less appropriate is if you need to work on a very small dataset and answer very simple questions, like frequencies or averages. In those cases, something like Excel could probably do the job just as easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    This is a great platform for a small but quickly growing organization. It works well out of the box without a lot of bells and whistles but can be configured for specific needs. Migrating "legacy" processes, data and culture requires a lot of up front training but is worth the effort. Customer support is top-notch, and a single administrator can manage multiple applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • SPSS has been around for quite a while and has amassed a large suite of functionality. One of its longest-running features is the ability to automate SPSS via scripting, AKA "syntax." There is a very large community of practice on the internet who can help newbies to quickly scale up their automation abilities with SPSS. And SPSS allows users to save syntax scripting directly from GUI wizards and configuration windows, which can be a real life-saver if one is not an experienced coder.
    • Many statistics package users are doing scientific research with an eye to publish reproducible results. SPSS allows you to save datasets and syntax scripting in a common format, facilitating attempts by peer reviewers and other researchers to quickly and easily attempt to reproduce your results. It's very portable!
    • SPSS has both legacy and modern visualization suites baked into the base software, giving users an easily mountable learning curve when it comes to outputting charts and graphs. It's very easy to start with a canned look and feel of an exported chart, and then you can tweak a saved copy to change just about everything, from colors, legends, and axis scaling, to orientation, labels, and grid lines. And when you've got a chart or graph set up the way you like, you can export it as an image file, or create a template syntax to apply to new visualizations going forward.
    • SPSS makes it easy for even beginner-level users to create statistical coding fields to support multidimensional analysis, ensuring that you never need to destructively modify your dataset.
    • In closing, SPSS's long and successful tenure ensures that just about any question a new user may have about it can be answered with a modicum of Google-fu. There are even several fully-fledged tutorial websites out there for newbie perusal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    • The applications are linked to each other so that activities can be shared, collaborated and escalated in one platform.
    • Applications are sufficient "out of the box" but can be configured easily with its intuitive Design tools.
    • Users can go to their personal dashboard to stay on top of their tasks across multiple applications and monitor status of activities in progress.
    • The workflow-based applications keep activities moving forward efficiently but following standard processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Cost is becoming prohibitive.
    • Availability of procedures in the base package seems to be dwindling.
    • The copy-and-paste function from output to Excel is not as easy as it once was (now I have to do a "paste special").
    • Text and date handling are terrible.
    • Need to include AI-based NLP for survey verbatims and other text-based fields. This is becoming increasingly important in the CX world, yet SPSS seems to be ignoring it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    • Although the configuration is a "no code" approach, there is a learning curve to effecting design changes.
    • The user guide documentation provided is OK for administrators but needs to be more user-friendly for general users.
    • Importing "legacy" data from existing processes can be cumbersome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Both
    money and time are essential for success in terms of return on investment for any kind of research based project work. Using a Likert-scale questionnaire is very easy for data entry and analysis
    using IBM SPSS. With the help of IBM SPSS, I found very fast and reliable data
    entry and data analysis for my research. Output from SPSS is very easy to
    interpret for data analysis and findings
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    Probably because I have been using it for so long that I have used all of the modules, or at least almost all of the modules, and the way SPSS works is second nature to me, like fish to swimming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    There is always resistance to change, but users are finding Intellect QMS to exceed their expectations as we migrate from our legacy "island" Sharepoint-based processes. Training is actually easiest to do hands-on, and users can learn quickly and then help train others. Users appreciate the personal navigation dashboard and the familiarity of the interface from one application to another. The workflow-driven applications are intuitive and make the system easy to navigate for all levels of users, although the learning curves will vary. The "Design-Test-Live" approach facilitates the implementation of configuration changes suggested by users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    SPSS can tend to crash when I am trying to do a lot of data. This can slow me down when I need to do a lot of data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    SPSS does the job, but it can be slow. I do have to plan a lot of time to get through a huge amount of data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I have not contacted IBM SPSS for support myself. However, our IT staff has for trying to get SPSS Text Analytics Module to work. The issue was never resolved, but I'm not sure if it was on the IT's end or on SPSS's end
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    Have a plan for managing the yearly upgrade cycle. Most users work in the desktop version, so there needs to be a mechanism for either pushing out new versions of the software or a key manager to deal with updated licensing keys. If you have a lot of users this needs to be planned for in advance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    If you have made it this far, you should have a very good idea of how SPSS stacks up the competition (data processing and analytics tools). Even the free ones, such as r Studio or Stata, are leaps and bounds ahead of SPSS. IBM is resting on a reputation developed nearly 30 years ago and has shown no desire to improve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No comparison with the huge improvement Intellect is compared to the software we were using in the past. Night and Day difference.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    I am neutral because I have not had to look into scalability since I am using as a student.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • I found SPSS easier to use than SAS as it's more intuitive to me.
    • The learning curve to use SPSS is less compared to SAS.
    • I used SAS, to a much lesser extent than SPSS. However, it seems that SAS may be more suitable for users who understand programming. With SPSS, users can perform many statistical tests without the need to know programming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Intellect
    • Users appreciate the time and effort saved by having all of the QMS functions connected and in one place, without having to rely on emails, Sharepoint links multiple modes of communication to keep track of their activities and responsibilities.
    • The no-code platform means we don't need IT support to maintain and configure the applications. One administrator was able to get the system launched and effective in just several weeks, with ongoing training and customization as users and applications are added.
    • Our organization was recently certified to ISO 9001:2015. Intellect QMS helped us to navigate internal and audits confidently and effectively.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM SPSS Statistics Screenshots

    Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Forecasting. This enables users to build time-series forecasts regardless of their skill level.Screenshot of SPSS Statistics Regression. These predict categorical outcomes and apply nonlinear regression procedures.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Neural Networks. These can discover complex relationships and improve predictive models.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics Curated Help. These can interpret correlation output.Screenshot of IBM SPSS Statistics AI Output Assistant interprets statistical output in easy to consume language

    Intellect QMS Screenshots

    Screenshot of Custom dashboard, with real-time metrics to give users greater visibility, insights and monitoring.Screenshot of A No-Code Compliance Platform used to customize apps, or ti build new business apps to automate business processes.