IBM Storage Protect vs. TrilioVault
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM Storage Protect | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Storage Protect (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect, or Tivoli Storage Manager) provides data resilience for physical file servers, virtual environments, and applications. Organizations can scale up to manage billions of objects per backup server. | N/A |
TrilioVault | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Trilio is a provider of cloud-native data protection for Kubernetes, OpenStack and Red Hat Virtualization environments headquartered in Framingham. The company's TrilioVault technology is used by cloud infrastructure operators and developers for backup and recovery, migration and application mobility. The vendor boasts customers in telecom, defense, automotive and financial services, who are using TrilioVault to recover from disasters, migrate workloads, move workloads to new infrastructure and… | N/A |
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | TrilioVault Enterprise Edition offers support for Kubernetes, OpenShift, OpenStack or Red Hat Virtualization. Enterprise Edition is the full product, with no time or scale limitations, and includes premium service and support. Enterprise Edition is priced by number of nodes or VMs on an annual basis. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
89% Would buy again 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
89% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Center Backup |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | BDRShield Score6.5 out of 10 | BDRShield Score6.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Bacula Enterprise Score8.6 out of 10 | Bacula Enterprise Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Bacula Enterprise Score8.6 out of 10 | Bacula Enterprise Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 1.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.2 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 10.0 | - |
| Professional Services | 9.0 | - |
| IBM Storage Protect | TrilioVault | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |



