TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Watson Explorer vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Watson Explorer

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Explorer supports enterprise search with unstructured data analysis, machine learning, and content analysis to improve decision-making, support customer service or serve other business needs.N/A

    IBM Watson Studio

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of IBM Watson Explorer and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM Watson Explorer
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.1
    22 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    MDM Integration00 Ratings6.414 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of IBM Watson Explorer and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM Watson Explorer
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    10.0
    22 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Visualization00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of IBM Watson Explorer and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM Watson Explorer
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Data Transformations00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Data Encryption00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of IBM Watson Explorer and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM Watson Explorer
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of IBM Watson Explorer and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    Feature
    IBM Watson Explorer
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
    8.0
    22 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Small Businesses
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Posit
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (65 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Watson ExplorerIBM Watson Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    The Watson Explorer is great because it potentially replaces a meriad of other low-level analytics products that we would need to use for data analytics and data mining. WEX isn't really suitable much beyond doing text and data analytics and performing machine learning, so if your team doesn't really have a use-case that fits all of these categories, it is worth looking at an alternative.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Free to try - It's possible to use most of the useful features of Watson Explore on their trial/demo accounts.
    • Super well-designed data analytics tool - Most of the tools and features of the explorer are really useful, and truly help you fully understand the depth of any format of textual data.
    • Extensive sources compatibility - WEX can retrieve data from a large range of sources, and the compatibility there is quite good as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
    • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
    • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
    • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Support is just OK, like most of the other IBM Watson products. The setup/integration is really hands-on, but it's also problematic because support later may take a considerable amount of time.
    • UI could still use a little more improvement - part of the administration and sources dashboards are hard to navigate.
    • The Application Builder is a great part of the product, but hard to learn/understand - this is where we needed the most support from IBM and tutorials/documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
    • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
    • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Never had slow response even on our very busy network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Google Cloud offers a Natural Language product, but it is just an API. This API doesn't offer the useful visualizations of relations, analytics, and graphs that IBM Watson Explorer offers on their interface. For this reason, we chose to go with IBM WEX. For later stages of our production, we decided to use Google's NLP API because we found that it was quick to integrate into production after studying data and developing models using IBM WEX.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Positive - Trial/demo period. This was really useful for us to figure out what features of WEX we liked most and how difficult it would be to integrate WEX into our workflow.
    • Negative - On-boarding was long and almost always requires support from IBM support, unlike most other products this advanced.
    • Positive - WEX replaced a large selection of alternative products we would have to use for the same functionality, and having all of that function in one place was definitely helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
    • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
    • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots