Amazon SageMaker vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon SageMaker
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Amazon SageMaker enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.N/A
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Pricing
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Considered Both Products
Amazon SageMaker
Chose Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker comes with other supportive services like S3, SQS, and a vast variety of servers on EC2. It's very comfortable to manage the process and also support the end application by one click hosting option. Also, it charges on the base of what you use and how long you …
Chose Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker is the best option for machine learning if you are already using the Amazon data science ecosystem. The software integrates nicely with MapReduce and most of the other Amazon tools. Additionally, MapReduce does a fairly good job of making the development of …
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Not applicable
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
4% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings6.414 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
Visualization00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
14% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
11% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Amazon SageMaker
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
7% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Small Businesses
Google Cloud AI
Google Cloud AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Google Cloud AI
Google Cloud AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Dataiku
Dataiku
Score 7.9 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(65 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon SageMakerIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon SageMaker is a great tool for developing machine learning models that take more effort than just point-and-click type of analyses. The software works well with the other tools in the Amazon ecosystem, so if you use Amazon Web Services or are thinking about it, SageMaker would be a great addition. SageMaker is great for consumer insights, predictive analytics, and looking for gems of insight in the massive amounts of data we create. SageMaker is less suitable for analysts who do generally "small" data analyses, and "small" data analyses in today's world can be billions of records.
Read full review
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Provides enough freedom for experienced data scientists and also for those who just need things done without going much deeper into building models.
  • Customization and easy to alter and change.
  • If you already are an Amazon user, you do not need to transition over to another software.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • The UI can be eased up a bit for use by business analysts and non technical users
  • For huge amount of data pull from legacy solutions, the platform lags a bit
  • Considering ML is an emerging topic and would be used by most of the organizations in future, the pipeline integrations can be optimized
Read full review
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Performance
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
In-Person Training
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Online Training
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Amazon SageMaker comes with other supportive services like S3, SQS, and a vast variety of servers on EC2. It's very comfortable to manage the process and also support the end application by one click hosting option. Also, it charges on the base of what you use and how long you use it, so it becomes less costly compared to others.
Read full review
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Scalability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • We have been able to deliver data products more rapidly because we spend less time building data pipelines and model servers.
  • We can prototype more rapidly because it is easy to configure notebooks to access AWS resources.
  • For our use-cases, serving models is less expensive with SageMaker than bespoke servers.
Read full review
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
ScreenShots