IBM Watson Visual Recognition (discontinued) vs. Litera Kira

As I mentioned before, it can only be employed in simple basic visual recognition applications. It can be employed in large projects and relying it on completely is not encouraged. It's better to create your own algorithms rather than using it. If you are from a non-programming background, then I may suggest you rely on this and use it to develop simple apps that can predict a few plants and animals.

Incentivized

Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.

• Food recognition
• High reliability
• Speed

Incentivized

• UI/UX - tagging and naming feels much easier than you'd expect machine learning to feel
• Accuracy - Kira's built-in models perform well out of the box
• Assistance - Kira's support team gets back to me same day if I have a question

Incentivized

• Not perfect
• Accuracy is doubted and sometimes it may not predict correctly.
• I think it should be improved and should add a few more functionalities.

Incentivized

• Inability to relabel smart fields to suit the review process means it is hard to align it to particular projects (e.g. it would be useful to relabel the "Assignment" smart field as "Is the contract assignable?")
• Not enough non-English smart fields.
• Needs the ability to resell user-trained smart fields in a marketplace.
• Output is not customizable enough.
• Built-in analysis tools are useful but a little basic.

Incentivized

I am giving this rating on the basis of its usability in real-time applications and based on the interface to upload negative and positive images to train the AI. But it's not perfect and sometimes its predictions are wrong. On overall usability, it's better if you are planning on working with UI rather than using complex programs and algorithms on your own.

Incentivized

If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.

Incentivized

Customer Support is excellent. The online help portal is probably the best I have ever seen. Great videos with content easily found. The HelpLine is staffed by knowledgeable people. The videos have saved us providing a lot of in-house training, which we would struggle to resource. The account managers really know the product and their law firm clients and share best practices and trends.

Incentivized

Kira offers a lot more out of the box than other providers and is also more flexible around integrations. This, plus the clear pricing structure, is why we went for it instead of (or as well as) others. Diligen, RAVN, Leverton, Della, Seal not in list.

Incentivized

• High cost if models are trained

Incentivized

• Positive ROI: Increased comfort level of attorneys and use of tech
• Neutral ROI: It has not significantly change how we handle projects, since there still is a need for manual review
• Negative ROI: It has been cost prohibitive to scale it

Incentivized