IBM watsonx.data vs. Scylla

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM watsonx.data
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Watsonx.data is presented as an open, hybrid and governed data store that makes it possible for enterprises to scale analytics and AI with a fit-for-purpose data store, built on an open lakehouse architecture, supported by querying, governance and open data formats to access and share data.N/A
Scylla
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
ScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
Pricing
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Features
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
IBM watsonx.data
-
Ratings
Scylla
8.4
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Performance00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(27 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(9 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(3 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM watsonx.dataScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Real-time transaction processing (both reads and writes) is where DataStax Enterprise shines. It's very fast with linear scalability should more resources be needed. Additional nodes are added very easily. DataStax Enterprise on its own (without Solr or Spark enabled) isn't well suited for long complicated reports. The data model doesn't support joining multiple tables together which is common in BI reporting.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Datastax Cassandra provides high availability and good performance for a database. It is built on top of open source Apache Cassandra so you can always somewhat understand the internal functioning and why.
  • Datastax Cassandra is fairly simple to start using, you can install/setup your cluster and be productive in 1 day.
  • Datastax Cassandra provides a lot of good detailed documentation, and when starting, the detailed free videos on the Datastax site and documentation are very helpful.
  • Datastax Enterprise Edition of Cassandra provides more tools, good support, and quick response SLA for enterprise business support.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Low-latency reads
  • CQL has a familiar syntax
  • Parity with Cassandra
  • Practical features
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Integration complexity with Security Tools while watsonx.Data is well-suited for native tools, but integration with third-party security tools requires custom connectors or manual ETL pipelines. which leads to an increase in setup time.
  • User interface and query time can be improved.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
As an open source technology Cassandra can be readily used with or without any commercial support. DataStax provides value-added services and features, and in the end it is up to individual situations to strike a balance between the desirability of such support/service versus the associated cost.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
DataStax has a good community built around it and has amazing scalability options. Though the initial setup is a bit costly, in the long run, it makes up for it. It also has powerful monitoring tools and a clean UI.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
good recovery features
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
scalable product
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
We have had a few situations where we caused an outage or something has gone wrong and we are able to get a support person to offer live help within minutes. The escalation process is excellent - the best I've seen - and the support team is incredibly strong. Outside of emergencies, the team is very helpful with general questions and working through data model exercises and the subscription I believe still comes with some hours to help get the data model reviewed.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
easy to follow documentation, support is there when needed
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
use saas service
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Pinecone and IBM watsonx.data (Milvus in our case) both work great as a full-managed cloud-based vector database. We selected IBM watsonx.data because it integrates well with watson.ai and is a little more beginner friendly than Pinecone, but I think both are great anyway.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
cognos integration works great
Read full review
ScyllaDB
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • for one automation project, we managed to cut cloud storage costs by a third through IBM watsonx.data's lakehouse optimization
  • data integration projects have had a 20 % reduction in turnaround times. Can only imagine how that will improve with the Claude partnership
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
Read full review
ScreenShots