Watsonx.data is presented as an open, hybrid and governed data store that makes it possible for enterprises to scale analytics and AI with a fit-for-purpose data store, built on an open lakehouse architecture, supported by querying, governance and open data formats to access and share data.
N/A
Teradata Vantage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Teradata Vantage is presented as a modern analytics cloud platform that unifies everything—data lakes, data warehouses, analytics, and new data sources and types. Supports hybrid multi-cloud environments and priced for flexibility, Vantage delivers unlimited intelligence to build the future of business.
Users can deploy Vantage on public clouds (such as AWS, Azure, and GCP), hybrid multi-cloud environments, on-premises with Teradata IntelliFlex, or on commodity hardware with VMware.
Snowflake is a more mature, simpler to use product but watsonx.data has a more open architecture and it better for hybrid cloud environments. In addition, watsonx.data is part of an entire watsonx platform that offers many advantages over is closest competitors. The single …
IBM watsonx.data stacks up against Snowflake very well. It come in at a less expensive price. Also, you can run IBM watsonx.data on any cloud. or on prem.. Much more flexible.
with iceberg open table format and presto engine the performance and flexibility increased and also with watsonx.ai with GENAI capability which other tools lag as of now.
We use IBM watsonx.data as a unified data platform to integrate and govern data across systems, eliminating silos and improving data quality. Its open lakehouse architecture enables faster, trusted access to data for AI, analytics, and reporting, forming the foundation for …
Oracle really cost effective solution, where it has the support of community, with rich integration of all wide range of oracle products. Amazon sageMaker is another cost effective solution, where is tightly coupled with AWS platform, in terms of performance it copes up really …
IBM watsonx.data integrates well with other IBM services used in our deployment and provides enterprise grade security which is critical for our regulated business
AstraDB was giving me vector database solutions, Retrieval Augmented Generation features and even Agentic workflows that IBM watsonx.data does not have currently. But the volume of data I've coming everyday and has to deal with everyday, can do anomaly detection just in plain …
Pinecone and IBM watsonx.data (Milvus in our case) both work great as a full-managed cloud-based vector database. We selected IBM watsonx.data because it integrates well with watson.ai and is a little more beginner friendly than pinecone, but I think both are great anyway.
IBM watsonx.data helps in reducing data warehousing costs. IBM AIOps Insights focuses mainly on incident management, while IBM watsonx.data provides a flexible data store.
May be I cannot say why I choose, business preferred to use IBM watsonx.data which is good for me as well to learn. I cannot compare this tool with others because it has unique feature which alteryx or Amazon or Azure dont have. So this tool is going good for us.
I believe DataStax Enterprise is the best in class. There are some things that are different with the schema-less systems but I found DataStax Enterprise easiest to implement while evaluating. The replication is on par or better than others in practice. We are evaluating …
DataStax Enterprise offered best-in-class write performance and scalability. The customer support team was very helpful in the adoption of new technology.
DataStax has an amazing community built around it and is also Cassandra is an open-source technology. The customer support is quite good compared to other vendors. Though you initially need to spend some hefty amount on infrastructure, in the long run, it makes up for it. We …
We chose datastax because we need a system always available and capable of ingesting a large amount of data per second, even if eventually consistent and with multi data center sync native support.
We considered Cloudera as an alternative using Kafka as the ingestion layer but …
Amazon DynamoDB and Datastax Cassandra are similar on masterless architecture and principles, DynamoDB is managed and needs cost analysis. If you need to have better control, Datastax is better.
I also did a prototype with Google Spanner in one of the recent innovation days, it …
Microsoft provides some great solutions but often times they are only providing the foundation for other vendors and partners to build off of, requiring you to work with their partners to fill out the capabilities or get to the level of performance you need. From a TCO …
Son similares. No seleccioné Teradata Vantage. Cuando ingrese a la compañía ya existe Teradata Vantage como herramienta corporativa They are similar. I did not choose Teradata Vantage. When I joined the company, Teradata Vantage was already established as a corporate tool.
The Teradata is leader and reference in the market.We had a project to migrate from Teradata on premise to Teradata Cloud, bring advantages por example: we can inprovement our worklouds with low impacts for our infra solution e bring better experience to work in the cloud tools …
The Teradata is leader and reference in the market. We had a project to migrate from Teradata on premise to Teradata Cloud, bring advantages por example: we can inprovement our worklouds with low impacts for our infra solution e bring better experience to work in the cloud tools …
I have sought feedback from other people and nothing would appear to do what Vantage does for us. There may be new capabilities that are comparable to other providers, but for the everyday data engineering, I would struggle to find anything better
Teradata is way ahead of its competitor because of its unique features of ensuring data privacy and data never gets corrupted even in worst case scenario. In most cases, the data corruption is a major issue if left unused and it leads to important data being wiped off which in …
Oracle Exadata is an excellent product. Performs mass data processing with similar capability compared to Teradata. Some features Exadata has lack for Teradata Vantage, such as archive generation, consistent reading and writing (simultaneously), RMAN backing up online …
I have used Databricks and DataLake, which are better with semi-structured data than Teradata; and also integrate with other tools. And the most important factor is that in these tools you can separate storage from processing.
Datastax Cassandra is a Java based linearly scalable NoSQL database, best-in-class tunable performance, fault tolerant, distributed, masterless, time series database and has easy-to-use administration and monitoring functionality with opscenter. Configured correctly there is no downtime and no data loss. The documentation is exhaustive, and the community is agile and supportive, and Datastax provides good support. For all these reasons, Datastax Cassandra has become a NoSQL technology of choice for many platforms. However it has some time investment on infrastructure and regular operational tasks, and if you do not have bandwidth for it, a managed NoSQL solution like DynamoDB might be more appropriate. Also if you have search needs on Cassandra and do not have corresponding Spark/Solr setup, Datastax Cassandra might not be ideal for you.
Teradata Vantage is well suited for large scale ETL pipelines like the ones we developed for anti money laundering risk matrices. It handles heavy joins, aggregations, and transformations on transactional data efficiently. We generate alert variables, adjust for inflation, and monitor establishments monthly with it, all integrated with Python and Control-M for a centralised automation across the company. For less appropriate, I would say that heavy resource demands might slow down experimentation for iterative work.
Integration complexity with Security Tools while watsonx.Data is well-suited for native tools, but integration with third-party security tools requires custom connectors or manual ETL pipelines. which leads to an increase in setup time.
Teradata can improve by supporting more native AWS cloud features. Currently if a node goes down the EC2 instance must be restarted. It isn't something that happens frequently but more tight integration with cloud providers like AWS and Azure will allow Teradata to offer truly dynamic scaling.
Some Teradata features are oversold before they are ready for prime-time. Teradata is not unique in this but if something is sold as an integrated product stack it should really be integrated not something that requires an extensive development cycle to be integrated at a customer's expense. If something is supported it should've really be tested and QAed thoroughly before a customer touches it.
As an open source technology Cassandra can be readily used with or without any commercial support. DataStax provides value-added services and features, and in the end it is up to individual situations to strike a balance between the desirability of such support/service versus the associated cost.
Teradata is a mature RDBMS system that expands its functionality towards the current cloud capabilities like object storage and flexible compute scale.
DataStax has a good community built around it and has amazing scalability options. Though the initial setup is a bit costly, in the long run, it makes up for it. It also has powerful monitoring tools and a clean UI.
Teradata Vantage allows us to create a scalable infrastructure to support our strategic initiatives. The dedicated compute power ensures reliable performance with isolated workloads and dedicated resources, optimizing workflows for faster, more efficient data transfers. The compute clusters support ETL processes and OSF’s developers and data science team with the flexibility to create self-service analytics, to spin up/down at any time, driving better performance and minimizing costs.
We have had a few situations where we caused an outage or something has gone wrong and we are able to get a support person to offer live help within minutes. The escalation process is excellent - the best I've seen - and the support team is incredibly strong. Outside of emergencies, the team is very helpful with general questions and working through data model exercises and the subscription I believe still comes with some hours to help get the data model reviewed.
We have meetings at the beginning with the technical team to explain our requirements to them and they were really putting in a lot of effort to come up with a solution which will address all our needs. They implemented the software and also trained a few of our resources on the same too. We can get in touch with them now as well whenever we run into a roadblock but it's very less now.
I believe DataStax Enterprise is the best in class. There are some things that are different with the schema-less systems but I found DataStax Enterprise easiest to implement while evaluating. The replication is on par or better than others in practice. We are evaluating Astra in our test environment and that has additional benefits we are looking forward to using.
Teradata is way ahead of its competitor because of its unique features of ensuring data privacy and data never gets corrupted even in worst case scenario. In most cases, the data corruption is a major issue if left unused and it leads to important data being wiped off which in ideal case should be stored for 3 years
Teradata is been absolutely phenomenal for our project because we feed huge chunks of data to it and get back the desired results in no time which earlier used to take hours to process and then also sometimes timeout.
We don't have to do any manual intervention for resource or task allocation, it is all taken care by Teradata internally and all the AMP's are given equal amount of work and have their own resources to complete them with no sharing with another.