IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Invoiced
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
Invoiced in Austin offers their invoicing and AR automation platform, providing a platform for collecting online payments or presenting electronic invoices, AR analytics, and support for subscription-based business management on higher service tiers with subscription analytics (e.g. churn, pricing plan management, etc.).
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Invoiced
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Invoiced
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Invoiced
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Invoiced
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Invoiced
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A 1-10 employee company with no accounting system integration needs and no customization may be suited for Invoiced. Although I wish I could, I cannot in good faith recommend any other scenario for which Invoiced is the right solution. Perhaps a subscription service that is very streamlined on autopay could work as well, but I cannot speak to that scenario directly. I do not think Invoiced can be trusted to integrate with accounting software, certainly not NetSuite, given the aforementioned reasons. There is a very high risk of system failures, connection breaks, improper code built into the core bundles, and they will blame the company for anything that is not totally standard operations. In summary, if your business does anything unique at all from a transaction lens, I would be very careful as Invoiced may promise to handle it in a Sales pitch, and then 9 months later it could still be unsolved. All the while, they are charging you even if the product is not launched, and they also will not let you terminate, because Invoiced will deny a "breach" even in the face of a directly observable example just to ride out the contract and keep all the money.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Communication is the #1 failure - the Invoiced contract Term starts PRE-launch on day 1, yet Invoiced had an extremely slow and encumbered way of onboarding and trying to set us up.
Core Product: In our testing, their core product broke numerous times, and if this were in a live scenario we would have been devastated. Be very careful as they don't take ownership for maintaining their integrations with all software, and things can break at any moment with updates
Systems: Invoiced rolled out updates that contained faulty code and damaged our accounting system. The lack of expertise, at least in NetSuite, is very dangerous and I recommend having in-house develops watch Invoiced's moves very carefully if you do end up trying to use them.
Lack of Ownership: We tried to terminate multiple times, only be to requested over and over that they can fix the problems. We gave them more time since we were so heavily invested from a time perspective, but they did not own the failures and we were even lied to directly by senior management in a remarkable failure to adhere to basic deadlines.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
We selected Invoiced primarily due to their purported high level of customizations and flexibility to handle differing business needs. That, unfortunately, became the exact reason we terminated the contract though. They have a basic framework for something that could be really great, and the potential is there, but they lack the in-house expertise and the product is far too infantile at present. Major bugs and similar issues need to be stamped out first. I can only hope they take it as a learning experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info