IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Mongoose
Score9 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$2,500
per year
Pricing
IFS Applications
Mongoose
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$2,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Mongoose
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Mongoose
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Mongoose
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Mongoose
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
At our college, the admissions team also uses Cadence. I think it's particularly useful for back-and-forth interactions in real time (or through an AI chatbot) My department focuses only on donors and alums. These communications are much less likely to be back-and-forth. They're more informational in nature which makes some of the features un-necessary. It's easy for a recipient to opt-out, but not easy to set up scenarios where they can opt out of specific types of texts - all-or-nothing is more likely and it's difficult for them to re-subscribe once they've opted out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There is built-in connection with Raiser's Edge NXT but the field mapping is overly complicated and setting it up requires action both on customer end and Cadence end
Cannot update a bad email address without deleting the record and re-importing it
Cannot simply add records - must be done through import from a spreadsheet
assigning a record to a user can only be done during initial import
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
We are currently evaluating Mailchimp's SMS option to see if the price for adding that feature is less than what we are paying for Cadence. Currently we are ONLY using Mailchimp for email communications, but the interface is much more user friendly. We have not yet had a chance to demo the SMS feature to compare it to Cadence, but we plan to check it out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Too early (one year) to have hard ROI info, but we have had constituents who have indicated a preference for text as their primary means of interacting with our organization.
Even with the integration with Raiser's Edge NXT it takes time to update the database with opt-outs.
We have fewer constituents with mobile numbers than those with email addresses. We will have to appeal to our constituents to share mobile numbers with us
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info