IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Oracle Hyperion
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Oracle Hyperion
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Oracle Hyperion
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Oracle Hyperion
Features
IFS Applications
Oracle Hyperion
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
28% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.7
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
4 Ratings
69% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion
10.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
10.017 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
10.020 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
10.016 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.