IFS Applications vs. Oracle Hyperion

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Oracle Hyperion
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Features
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Accounts payable9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
28% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Pricing8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.7
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
4 Ratings
69% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Forecasting8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Oracle Hyperion
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion
10.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings10.017 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings10.016 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion
8.2
20 Ratings
0% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.018 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.115 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings6.013 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 8.8 out of 10
Prophix
Prophix
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(5 ratings)
10.0
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsOracle Hyperion
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • It supports the web version in most later versions.
  • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
  • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
  • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
  • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
  • It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
  • It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
  • Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
  • It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
  • The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
  • Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IFS
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
  • Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
  • One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of