IFS Applications vs. Workiva

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Workiva
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Workiva is a cloud platform supporting ESG protecting, designed to provide collaboration, data integration, and an audit trail. The platform helps mitigate risk, and improves productivity.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Features
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
54% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pay calculation7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files5.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
API for custom integration8.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins8.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Accounts payable9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
28% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pricing8.65 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.7
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Billing Management7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling9.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
4 Ratings
69% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Production Process Design9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Forecasting8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Proposal Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Workiva
7.9
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings7.75 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.3 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 8.8 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(5 ratings)
5.7
(11 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(4 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.7
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsWorkiva
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Workiva
Wdesk is best suited for companies with demanding SEC filings and documents, with multiple revisions due to auditor/counsel review, and where financial reporting is extremely manual. Wdesk really helps take out the potential errors out of extremely manual processes, and helps automate regular financial reporting by allowing companies to link financial information and build customized flows of their information into financial statements and other documents (such as presentations or other internal reporting).
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • It supports the web version in most later versions.
  • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
  • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
  • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
  • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
Read full review
Workiva
  • The biggest strength of the program for our team is that multiple users can work in the document at the same time. Multiple users can be in the program updating financial statements, footnotes, MD&A - all without stepping on each other's toes.
  • Rolling forward the documents from one period to the next is pretty simple. Links to source documents are maintained and new ones can be added without much hassle.
  • Edits and changes can be made right up until the last minute before filing. There is no waiting period or pencils-down period unless we enforce one ourselves - the Financial Reporting team is in control of the timing of our filings.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
Read full review
Workiva
  • The automation could be better. A lot of mass updates are done manually.
  • Sometimes the system has connection issues and certain functions are down.
  • The customer service could be more proactive to provide regular training and sharing updates on the software.
  • Customer service could be better to help process the mass updates in a timely fashion.
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Workiva
Overall it's a good-to-go product because of its features. It's easy to set up, meets requirements, has quality support, etc. So far, it has been working quite well for me, and I wish to continue using it for as long as it meets my requirements.
Read full review
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Workiva
Workiva's technical support is impeccable and undoubtedly one of the best. The times we needed them, they were super quick and willing to help. It works 24 hours a day, and there will always be someone to help with doubts or technical problems regarding the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Read full review
Workiva
We moved from a third party filer to doing it in house. Have seen demos of products like Active Disclosure, which has come a long way from the beta version I saw and but we are not too far gone with Wdesk for us to evaluate other products. When we first signed up with Webfilings, (former name of Workiva), there were no viable products in the market. I had seen an Oracle product and a beta version of Active Disclosure. It was not hard to see the ease and intuitive-screens, to guide one through the filing process. The excel-like spreadsheets were an added bonus.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
Workiva
  • We spend less than we used to with a traditional printer.
  • We have been able to do turn-on-a-dime equity offerings with last minute changes and still file on time.
  • Inviting external legal into the platform has helped with communication but we actually suspect they spend MORE time (and billing) on our documents than they used to just simply because it's so easy to get at them anytime they want.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of