IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Workiva
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Workiva is a cloud platform supporting ESG protecting, designed to provide collaboration, data integration, and an audit trail. The platform helps mitigate risk, and improves productivity.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Workiva
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Workiva
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Workiva
Features
IFS Applications
Workiva
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
54% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
11% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
28% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.7
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
4 Ratings
69% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
12% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Workiva
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Workiva
7.9
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Common repository of GRC items
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Risk management
00 Ratings
7.75 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Wdesk is best suited for companies with demanding SEC filings and documents, with multiple revisions due to auditor/counsel review, and where financial reporting is extremely manual. Wdesk really helps take out the potential errors out of extremely manual processes, and helps automate regular financial reporting by allowing companies to link financial information and build customized flows of their information into financial statements and other documents (such as presentations or other internal reporting).
The biggest strength of the program for our team is that multiple users can work in the document at the same time. Multiple users can be in the program updating financial statements, footnotes, MD&A - all without stepping on each other's toes.
Rolling forward the documents from one period to the next is pretty simple. Links to source documents are maintained and new ones can be added without much hassle.
Edits and changes can be made right up until the last minute before filing. There is no waiting period or pencils-down period unless we enforce one ourselves - the Financial Reporting team is in control of the timing of our filings.
Overall it's a good-to-go product because of its features. It's easy to set up, meets requirements, has quality support, etc. So far, it has been working quite well for me, and I wish to continue using it for as long as it meets my requirements.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Workiva's technical support is impeccable and undoubtedly one of the best. The times we needed them, they were super quick and willing to help. It works 24 hours a day, and there will always be someone to help with doubts or technical problems regarding the tool.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
We moved from a third party filer to doing it in house. Have seen demos of products like Active Disclosure, which has come a long way from the beta version I saw and but we are not too far gone with Wdesk for us to evaluate other products. When we first signed up with Webfilings, (former name of Workiva), there were no viable products in the market. I had seen an Oracle product and a beta version of Active Disclosure. It was not hard to see the ease and intuitive-screens, to guide one through the filing process. The excel-like spreadsheets were an added bonus.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
We spend less than we used to with a traditional printer.
We have been able to do turn-on-a-dime equity offerings with last minute changes and still file on time.
Inviting external legal into the platform has helped with communication but we actually suspect they spend MORE time (and billing) on our documents than they used to just simply because it's so easy to get at them anytime they want.