TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Imperva Attack Analytics vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Imperva Attack Analytics

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AImperva Attack Analytics, (formerly ThreatRadar), is a threat intelligence service relying on research from Imperva's Application Defense Center (ADC), integratable into Imperva's WAF solutions and able to be fed into enterprise security data.N/A

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

    Score1.1 out of 10
    N/ACortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
    Pricing
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Considered Both Products
    Imperva, a Thales company
    No answer on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Splunk SOAR
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.4
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Imperva Attack AnalyticsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Imperva, a Thales company
    I have found the solution to be flexible, adaptable and responsive which enables the implementation of risk management principles and security best practices. It provides visibility into cloud application usage, including what data has been accessed, when and by whom that help detect behavioral anomalies with app usage and alert on suspicious events
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
    problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
    of a button.
    ●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
    emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
    ●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
    They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
    other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
    making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
    errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Imperva, a Thales company
    • It quickly shows us the statistics graphically.
    • It gives us a super grainy detail of the attack.
    • The board is very friendly.
    • It is always constantly updated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Automation with immediate security responses.
    • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
    • Analysis and reporting feature.
    • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
    • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
    • Centralized monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Imperva, a Thales company
    • The UI does not feel intuitive
    • The support documentation sometimes is lacking or unclear
    • API integration seems a little more complicated than need be.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
    • The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
    • Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Imperva, a Thales company
    No answers on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Imperva, a Thales company
    No answers on this topic
    Palo Alto Networks
    It was much easier than we all anticipated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Imperva, a Thales company
    We chose Imperva Attack Analytics for its ability to monitor and audit database activities and its ability to scale and meet demands of the distributed environment. The solution is simple, straightforward and transparent for colleagues, and provides real-time event monitoring, audit analysis and customisable reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Imperva, a Thales company
    • We gain in reputation as our website has never been down.
    • We gain credibility as we are protected with the best security tool.
    • We gain trust, our clients know that their accounts are well protected.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
    • With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
    • This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots