Imperva Attack Analytics vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

I have found the solution to be flexible, adaptable and responsive which enables the implementation of risk management principles and security best practices. It provides visibility into cloud application usage, including what data has been accessed, when and by whom that help detect behavioral anomalies with app usage and alert on suspicious events

Incentivized

XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.

Incentivized

• It quickly shows us the statistics graphically.
• It gives us a super grainy detail of the attack.
• The board is very friendly.
• It is always constantly updated.

Incentivized

• Automation with immediate security responses.
• Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
• Analysis and reporting feature.
• Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
• Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
• Centralized monitoring.

Incentivized

• The UI does not feel intuitive
• The support documentation sometimes is lacking or unclear
• API integration seems a little more complicated than need be.

Incentivized

• The XSOAR bot creates a lot of noise on the summary page of any XSOAR incident. Although the filter is available to reduce the view, by default this should not be visible cluttering the whole scenario.
• The interface has too much data on a single pane. I would love to have many buttons to just click and do stuff.
• Also, I would love to have search areas more interactive and easier to navigate.

It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.

Incentivized

It was much easier than we all anticipated.

Incentivized

We chose Imperva Attack Analytics for its ability to monitor and audit database activities and its ability to scale and meet demands of the distributed environment. The solution is simple, straightforward and transparent for colleagues, and provides real-time event monitoring, audit analysis and customisable reports.

Incentivized

The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.

Incentivized

• We gain in reputation as our website has never been down.
• We gain credibility as we are protected with the best security tool.
• We gain trust, our clients know that their accounts are well protected.

Incentivized

• Demisto has Eased malware analysis and threat hunting
• With Demisto, it is simple to create playbooks and scripts
• This is helped automate policy configurations on our PA firewalls through Panorama

Incentivized