IMS PEI vs. Paradigm

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IMS PEI
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
IMS PEI is a Pressure Equipment Integrity cloud-based software. It helps prevent leaks and explosions by improving asset availability through inspection planning. There is no need to have an expensive inspection schedule to ensure the safety of an organization's people and high asset availability. With IMS PEI, users can optimize inspection schedules to operate as safely and budget-friendly as possible.N/A
Paradigm
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Paradigm is an oil and gas oriented exploration and seismic analytics platform, now owned and supported by Emerson since the 2018 acquisition.N/A
Pricing
IMS PEIParadigm
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IMS PEIParadigm
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IMS PEIParadigm
User Ratings
IMS PEIParadigm
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IMS PEIParadigm
Likelihood to Recommend
Cenosco
No answers on this topic
Emerson
The Paradigm geologic and petrophysical interpretation software suite offers a complete package for integrated projects where a team starts from offset well data and leads all the way to mapping of horizons, properties and reservoir models. Geolog, the petrophysical module, is very powerful and versatile. Although they offer separate add-ons, for smaller projects where the petrophysical interpretation is done by a third-party, even the minimum package might be overkill.
Read full review
Pros
Cenosco
No answers on this topic
Emerson
  • Geolog is extremely robust and powerful in handling large volumes of logs per well and a large number of wells, which is an asset for basin-scale projects.
  • Geolog is very flexible in terms of customizing log layout presentations and calculating anything via mathematical or logical expressions.
  • Epos display of fluid production data is very useful in cross-analyzing maturity and organic content versus hydrocarbons produced.
Read full review
Cons
Cenosco
No answers on this topic
Emerson
  • Geolog could use a LAS batch loading graphical interface that doesn't require the use of prompt commands.
  • Geolog's geologic intervals display has improved in the last versions, but it's still cumbersome to set up and maintain (i.e. adding new intervals, changing stratigraphy).
  • SKUA-Paradigm should support geographic coordinates in order to avoid the workaround of creating pseudo-coordinates across UTM zone boundaries.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cenosco
No answers on this topic
Emerson
Regarding the petrophysical modules, I have used other petrophysical software packages, and Paradigm is superior in data handling, visualization, flexibility, and batch calculations. Regarding the mapping and modeling, Paradigm is on par with other software I used on the same scale. SKUA-Gocad has some advantages over its main competitor, in terms of data manipulation, but the inability to handle geographic coordinates has a negative impact on my work efficiency.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cenosco
No answers on this topic
Emerson
  • Paradigm Geolog has allowed us to handle the vast quantities of well log data in order to achieve our research goals and deliver the results to the sponsoring companies.
  • Paradigm Epos and SKUA-GOCAD have made possible to map the results of our petrophysical analysis on a basin-wide scale encompassing two provinces, without which our research deliverables would not have been possible.
Read full review
ScreenShots