Infobip vs. Pypestream

OpenMarket is well suited to support enterprise SMS at scale, with a wholesale and flexible solution. Their provisioning team is great in terms of response time, and support for their products is deeply rooted in industry and technological understanding of SMS. OpenMarket would not be well suited for small companies just starting to test the waters with SMS in a low barrier way.

Incentivized

Pypestream is suited for standard chatbot and conversational flows versus more multi-departmental scenarios. They do very well with guided flow bot services which are great for agent bots within a contact center, but less so for those implementations that have a large document management implementation for FAQs. They do well with service integrations; however, at times troubleshooting edge cases that are impacting performance and adoption can take a while to remedy. I want to believe that better monitoring tools on the platform side would alleviate this for them.

Incentivized

• Trans SMS
• WhatsApp for Business
• Marketing automation
• Dashboards
• Great Customer Success team

Incentivized

• Native live agent platform
• Managed services for service creation and maintenance
• Custom analytics

Incentivized

• OpenMarket does most things well. One thing they are missing is MMS capabilities on text enabled long numbers.
• The portal for entering shortcode program briefs is kind of clunky, it would be nice is account managers took the Word document and imported it into the tool for clients.

Incentivized

• Generative AI - Large Language Model Support
• Standardized Reporting
• Custom UI Support
• Developer Tools

Incentivized

Best customer success team. Newer channels to reach customers are quickly worked upon and implemented faster. Transparency with billing

Incentivized

Infobip gradually introduces things sometimes which is difficult to implement

Incentivized

- always available to provide support - don't have to raise tickets which goes in constant loop of not getting answered

Incentivized

A strong roadmap involving key stakeholders can help move things faster. Be clear with volume commitments for delivery channels.

Incentivized

As a top tier aggregator, OpenMarket requires contracts to utilize their services, whereas other SaaS providers allow users to signup and start sending within a shorter amount of time. The benefit of using OpenMarket is the relationship, and the SLAs in availability they maintain. Other aggregators offer equal levels of service, so there are other shops in town selling the same thing with the same reliability.

Incentivized

In comparison to Microsoft Bot Framework or now Azure AI service structure, where Pypestream is better suited is in those organizations who want to truly have a partner in development. Pypestream allows the flexibility for your Dev teams to do it themselves, or to be in a managed service where you provide requirements and information and they build and allow you to test and give approvals. They are more willing to work directly with you versus a Microsoft where you will eventually get pushed off to a 3rd party partner to help with advanced implementations.

Incentivized

• OpenMarket has had a positive effect on our business in terms of providing a low-cost bulk SMS and MMS solution.
• We are able to provide enterprise level SMS services in a reliable and cost-effective way.
• Our business objective to have high availability, and connections with top tier aggregators is supported by our relationship with OpenMarket.

Incentivized

• Enabled the contact center business lane to grow a chat agent support channel that has a 2 to 1 (customer to agent) support ratio
• Provides an alternate channel for training, marketing information, and data services which help grow our business and support different value streams

Incentivized