Infor Cloverleaf Integration Platform vs. InterSystems HealthShare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Infor Cloverleaf Integration Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Cloverleaf improves healthcare outcomes and operations by connecting organizations and streamlining interoperability—with FHIR and API management support.N/A
InterSystems HealthShare
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Connecting providers, patients, and payers through a unified care record and analytics that span the care continuum. Creates a Unified Care Record for Collaborative Care HealthShare creates a unified, community-wide health record as the foundation for coordinated, value-based care and population health management. With embedded intelligence, and delivery of just the right information at the right time and place within delivery, management, and payment processes, HealthShare enables…N/A
Pricing
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Considered Both Products
Infor Cloverleaf Integration Platform

No answer on this topic

InterSystems HealthShare
Chose InterSystems HealthShare
InterSystems HealthShare is not your standard integration platform. While the Health Connect product could be construed as an 'interface engine', it is so much more. The capabilities to extend the engine using low code and visual business process modeling ensures a wealth of …
Best Alternatives
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
SnapLogic
SnapLogic
Score 8.1 out of 10
SnapLogic
SnapLogic
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SnapLogic
SnapLogic
Score 8.1 out of 10
SnapLogic
SnapLogic
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformInterSystems HealthShare
Likelihood to Recommend
Infor
Web API integration, healthcare integration is best suited in Cloverleaf. It is robust. So it's perfectly well suited where infrastructure is advanced and up to date.
Read full review
InterSystems
InterSystems HealthShare is an extremely powerful platform for which we have not found a need it cannot meet. Granted, some particular complex solutions may require a bit more 'engineering' level talent than some healthcare organizations staff in their traditional 'interface departments'. Organizations that make the investment in InterSystems AND their staff through training and empowerment of bettering their career will rapidly reap the rewards of a robust integration foundation with support for rapidly increasing the organization's ability to action their data using analytics, natural language processing, machine learning and business process orchestration. Through HealthShare, I have been able to harvest key business and clinical metrics rapidly from plain text blobs into discrete data elements, empowering our analytic users, reducing manual data entry and bettering the lives of our most important customer - the patient.
Read full review
Pros
Infor
  • Translation and support of all HL7 version data.
  • Easy database integration.
  • Debuggers while translation of data.
Read full review
InterSystems
  • A wealth of specific integration adaptors provided with the product, allowing for rapid low-code integrations for a myriad of use-cases.
  • Most InterSystems provided functionality delivered with the product can be review and extended to allow for rapid development of custom solutions for adaptors and tools not met out-of-the-box.
  • Continual timely releases ensure organizations can keep up to date with the rapidly changing healthcare integration space, while trusting that upgrades do not mean months of testing and validation. Most major upgrades can be completed within a few weeks of simple unit testing.
Read full review
Cons
Infor
  • High cost if one needs to migrate to another environment like cloud.
  • Customer engagement. We are not yet fully aware of all services and capabilities Infor provides.
  • Does not offer bundled deals. Each solutions is sold separately.
Read full review
InterSystems
  • Improvements to built in REST, SOAP and FHIR adapters to allow for low-code solutions against modern integration web service APIs.
  • Terminology engine improvements to provide auto-mapping against the plethora of terminology datasets required by FHIR and US CDI standards.
  • Tighter integration with Git/GitHub and similar platforms to enable Continuous Integration and Development models out of the box not only for general developers but healthcare integrators.
Read full review
Support Rating
Infor
Good support for what is needed or to be resolved. They have knowledge and required information when you approach them.
Read full review
InterSystems
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Infor
Easy to implement. Cost effective. Less complex. Less support and maintenance required comparatively.
Read full review
InterSystems
InterSystems HealthShare is not your standard integration platform. While the Health Connect product could be construed as an 'interface engine', it is so much more. The capabilities to extend the engine using low code and visual business process modeling ensures a wealth of use cases not covered by a traditional interface engine. Furthermore, while not a direct competitor of Epic (Epic is in fact an InterSystems customer themselves), we are far more comfortable relying on the robustness of the HealthShare platform for complex integrations, data modeling and data normalization using HealthShare than just Bridges and Interconnect alone.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Infor
  • Return wise it has a huge impact since a lot of healthcare data is integrated.
  • It gives us a different option to be offered to our clients as compared with other integration engine tools.
Read full review
InterSystems
  • Simple integration development time has been reduced from weeks to days.
  • Complex integration development time has been reduced from months to weeks.
  • On-call Support after-hours for the integration team has been nearly non-existent since the move to InterSystems, increasing employee retention and satisfaction as InterSystems 'just works'.
  • Less need to purchase other products to implement complex integrations through web service APIs and SQL ETL processes - it can all be done with InterSystems.
Read full review
ScreenShots