Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Informatica PowerCenter was data integration technology designed to form the foundation for data integration initiatives, application migration, or analytics. It is a legacy product.N/A
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Data Integrator is an ELT data integrator designed with interoperability other Oracle programs. The program focuses on a high-performance capacity to support Big Data use within Oracle.N/A
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Considered Both Products
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Basically the two solutions have, more or less, the same functions and features.The difference, for me, is that ThreatQuotient make more features over the security and I think is oriented to a SOC enviroments.

InformaticaExchange Connectors is oriented to the quality, …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Informatica PowerCenter is highly flexible and scalable for different types of data and it has any inbuilt function to transform our data into the meta data structure. Some of the tool sets such as TDM, is good in some ways but need EBF more than often when running into any …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
This is great tool to handle large data in multiple data sources.
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Informatica is a mature enterprise data integration platform for ETL jobs. Informatica has a suite full of tools other than PowerCenter that can be used for various use cases. It makes sense to know what the entire suite offers rather than just power center so large …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Informatica Power Center was already selected by my company before me. I just learned the software and started using it.
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
PowerCenter is simply so robust and refined that most other apps cannot do as much as it can. Even Informatica’s own Cloud version is so anemic as to not even compare against it. While from that perspective it feels bloated with too much to navigate through, many of those …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Alternatives:
  • Talend (open source, cheaper, longer development time, not intuitive UI, harder to troubleshoot, etc)
  • Pentaho (cheaper, better talend)
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
SSIS is a good entry into ETL, for smaller organizations or Microsoft-centric companies. It's strengths lie in its ease-of-use, quick turnaround, and simplicity. Its weaknesses lie in scalability and re-usability (you can achieve re-usability, however segmentation is at the …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
While Talend offers a much more comfortable interface to work with, Informatica's forte is performance. And on that front, Informatica Enterprise Data Integration certainly leaves Talend in the dust. For a more back-end-centric use case, Informatica is certainly the ETL tool of …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Microsoft SSIS, Ab Initio and IBM DataStage are evaluated against Informatica. Informatica scored well on licensing, hardware infrastructure flexibility and Big Data connectivity
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Much easier to learn and better performance
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Informatica tool is easy to use and easy to maintain, it also performs well, which are the major reasons my company selected it.
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
PowerCenter is very similar to DataStage, in that they both deal with the movement and manipulation of data from one source/system to another. As we use both extensively at my company, I cannot say how it compares beyond that both are well liked and widely used. I would assume …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
  1. Powercenter provides lots of features to implement mapping rules.
  2. Very easy to design, develop and maintain ETL code.
  3. Easily integrate with its other products like IDQ and MDM.
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
PowerCenter can be run from different types of OSs and can integrate with multiple types of databases and applications compared to SSIS. PowerCenter performs better with any type of database due to its ability to use native drivers to read as well as load data. Due to its seam …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
PowerCenter is the industry leader when it comes to interfacing with multiple source and target systems. The graphical interface increases employee productivity while reducing human resource expenditures and training requirements. These other tools offer some similar …
Chose Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Because of these key features :
  • Industry-leading data integration technology
  • Proven best-practice implementation methodology
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
This is very easy to integrate with Oracle data sources and as most of my databases are in oracle so I gave preference to this tool.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I have used Trifacta Google Data Prep quite a bit. We use Google Cloud Platform across our organization. The tools are very comparable in what they offer. I would say Data Prep has a slight edge in usability and a cleaner UI, but both of the tools have comparable toolsets.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle Data Integrator works very well if the rest of your systems are in the Oracle environment. There are some other good alternatives out there, but for what Oracle Data Integrator has to offer, it is good. It is also a little harder to use compared to the other ones I have …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We were using Actian Pervasive before switching to Oracle and the main reason was the cost. We were getting less functionality at even more cost. Although it is much faster in terms of operation, Oracle makes it easy to connect to all data sources making data integration easier …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I have used the Pentaho Data Integrator ETL tools in different projects with the SQL Server Integration Services product from the Microsoft product family. Oracle Data Integrator ETL product is efficient in projects where Oracle databases are heavily used. The end-user …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Powerful features and Oracle based
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
I think that Oracle Data Integrator is much better because of the user interface it provides.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Chose Oracle Data Integrator for its compatibility and integration with Oracle Goldengate
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is best suited for Oracle Hyperion environments. We have also used it to manage files on different operating systems.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Talend Data Integrator has been evaluated during the setup of the architecture for a customer, in comparison to ODI, since it's an open source ETL. But, differently from the meaning of "open source", it has licence costs too that aren't that different from ODI ones. Moreover, …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is the naturel successor of OWB, adopting the same EL-T approach but supporting a lot more technologies as source and target. The overall product is much more stable and not tied to the Oracle database.
Unlike Informatica, ODI generates all the code in the native underlying …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Because of variety of my projects that I involved, I used nearly all the world wide known tools within data warehouse environment.
  • Data Modeling Tools : Sybase Power Designer, SQL Developer Data Modeler, ERwin Data Modeler.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We migrated to ODI from OWB - and we found ODI to be light years ahead of OWB (features, performance, and connectivity). We also looked at Informatica, but were turned down by its cost. Being a SAP Business Objects shop, we also considered the SAP Data Integrator tool (it …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle's own ETL tool was Oracle Warehouse Builder, initially. When Oracle built the Oracle Business Intelligence Applications Suite, Oracle is in need of a strong ETL. As Oracle Warehouse Builder is not a strong ETL that customers prefer and as already Informatica captured …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
We thought IBM was too expensive and more difficult to use. With Microsoft, since we have our main application running with Oracle DB, we understood it’d be easier for us to work with ODI.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Oracle Data Integrator is a superior tool when dealing with Hyperion Planning and Essbase cubes and applications. The native connectors allow for easy data movement and transformations from one environment to the other. I do believe that Oracle Data Integrator is a very complex …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Informatica was slightly more intuitive but slightly less powerful than Oracle Data Integrator. My use of Informatica was much less extensive than Oracle Data Integrator, so I can not speak as in-depth about the strengths and weaknesses of Informatica. We used ODI much more for …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
ODI is less user friendly than FDM and DRM but is much easier to deploy than core ETL tools such as HAL or Informatica. The tool is easier to master and is usually more than capable of handling the run of the mill tasks required for Hyperion deployments. It has been a good …
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
IBM Infosphere, Informatica. I worked on the mentioned tools as well as ODI. I liked ODI because it is easy to use with great features that every other ETL tool has in the market.
Chose Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Our organization was using the Oracle BPM and the Oracle Data Integrator has good integration with BPM. We got good support from Oracle in setting up the integrated environment.
Features
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources9.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.9
Ratings
20% above category average
Simple transformations8.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Complex transformations7.00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
Data model creation9.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Metadata management8.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Business rules and workflow9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Collaboration6.10 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Testing and debugging9.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
9.1
Ratings
12% above category average
Integration with data quality tools9.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools9.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Likelihood to Recommend
Informatica Powercenter is the centerpiece of our overall enterprise data warehouse strategy. It's a critical enablement to ensure we can feed in multiple data stream and transform them into digestible data within our data warehouse. With its flexible capabilities and API availability, we were able to feed in industry standard data format as well as home grown data structure. Overall, we are very pleased with their capability and contribution to our data warehouse strategy.
Read full review
I tried various ETL tools and here is [where and] why I recommend Oracle Data Integrator. 1. When you want to process structured data from different databases - Teradata, Exadata, DB2, SQL, Oracle etc. 2. Oracle Data Integrator supports all platforms, hardware, and OS. This is a major advantage compared to other leading tools. 3. The ELT architecture giving a cutting edge performance over leading ETL tools. There is no need to align Oracle Data Integrator between source and target. ODI uses the source and target servers to perform complex transformations. 4. Speeds up the development and maintenance by reducing the code that developers need to write
Read full review
Pros
  • Informatica has a wide range of support for databases. Pretty much every mainstream DBMS is compatible here.
  • Designing ETL mappings and workflows is a very intuitive process, and takes minimal learning time and effort even for a beginner.
  • Informatica's biggest strength is its sheer performance. It is unmatched in terms of handling large volumes of data.
Read full review
  • Converts data from various sources into one target format using various business logic rules and integrates with various DBMS types.
  • Transformed data from DB2, SQL Server and other Oracle databases into flat files and then used ETL jobs to load into Oracle DB target
  • Data Integrator and Goldengate were used together to accomplish the data movement needed for business and data consolidation in live environment. Data Integrator helped with development and in reducing lead time to convert data into target.
Read full review
Cons
  • One of the challenges of PowerCenter is the lack of integration between the components and functionality provided by PowerCenter. PowerCenter consists of multiple components such has the repository service, integration service, metadata service. Considerable time and resources were required to install and configure these components before PowerCenter was available for use.
  • In order to connect to various data sources such as Netezza database or SAS datasets, PowerCenter requires the installation and configuration of separate plug-ins. We spent considerable time trouble-shooting and debugging problems while trying to get the various plug-ins integrated with PowerCenter and get them up and running as described in the documentation.
  • PowerCenter works well with structured data. That is, it is easy to work with input and output data that is pre-defined, fixed, and unchanging. It is much more difficult to work with dynamic data in which new fields are added or removed ad-hoc or if data format changes during the data ingest process. We have not been as successful in using PowerCenter for dynamic data.
  • One of the challenges of learning PowerCenter is that it is difficult to find documentation or publications that help you learn the various details about PowerCenter software. Unlike SAS Institute, Informatica does not publish books about PowerCenter. The documentation available with PowerCenter is sparse; we have learned many aspects of this technology through trial and error.
Read full review
  • Oracle support is not the best when needing help with the system
  • The documentation is also very poor and takes very long to generate
  • Some parts of it are not intuitive to use and get hard to troubleshoot
  • Like other Oracle products, you must have very, very thorough knowledge about their systems to understand
  • Like all Oracle products, cost is high
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our team enjoys using Informatica and feels that it is one of the best ETL tools on the market.
Read full review
It is maturing and over time will have a good pool of resources. Each new version has addressed the issues of the previous ones. Its getting better and bigger.
Read full review
Usability
The tool is very flexible and will meet most, if not all, of your data transformation needs. It is an expert-level tool, so building your knowledge-base and user-base (and keeping that base healthy!) is very important. But it will pay off with strong data management and the ability to leverage that data in ways you haven’t thought of yet. Bottom line, data is money, and PowerCenter helps you monetize your data.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Positives; - Multi-user development environment. - The speed of transformation. - Seamless integration with other Informatica products. Negatives; - There should be fewer windows, to maintain developers' focus while using. You probably need two big monitors when you start development with Informatica Power Center. - Oracle Analytical functions should be natively used. - E-LT support as well as ETL support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Informatica power center is a leader of the pack of ETL tools and has some great abilities that make it stand out from other ETL tools. It has been a great partner to its clients over a long time so it's definitely dependable. With all the great things about Informatica, it has a bit of tech burden that should be addressed to make it more nimble, reduce the learning curve for new developers, provide better connectivity with visualization tools.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Basically the two solutions have, more or less, the same functions and features.The difference, for me, is that ThreatQuotient make more features over the security and I think is oriented to a SOC enviroments. InformaticaExchange Connectors is oriented to the quality, integration and distribution of the data in order to ensure the reliability and access of data from different sources, as well as the integration in a single repository of enterprise data (External/internal)
Read full review
Talend Data Integrator has been evaluated during the setup of the architecture for a customer, in comparison to ODI, since it's an open source ETL. But, differently from the meaning of "open source", it has licence costs too that aren't that different from ODI ones. Moreover, the other components of the business intelligence architecture of the customer were Oracle, so we thought that ODI would suit at best with them, more than a different vendor software.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • PowerCenter has been instrumental in being the center of all data movement within the organization.
  • It has also provided a foundation for which re-usability and scalability are the focus.
  • Finding talent with experience and expertise in PowerCenter is far more likely due to its presence and market share.
Read full review
  • Oracle Data Integrator helps provide a business with the data it needs to defend the decisions it makes.
  • Oracle Data Integrator allows you to analyze data from what can be separate, different, and often outdated data sources. It allows you to make direct comparisons when analyzing data from different pieces of equipment.
  • Data from Oracle Data Integrator was used to analyze manufacturing quality and drive down spoilage, saving the company money.
Read full review
ScreenShots