Informatica PowerCenter was data integration technology designed to form the foundation for data integration initiatives, application migration, or analytics. It is a legacy product.
N/A
Phocas Business Intelligence
Score9.3 out of 10
N/A
Phocas helps users discover data and provides results in
real time. It is designed for non-technical
users and delivers a
simple yet powerful analytical capability that quickly turns data into a chart,
graph or map. It brings up data on
local, regional or global sales, inventory, forecasts, prices, profit margins,
budgets and more.
Phocas, based in the United
Kingdom, is a business intelligence firm with offices in…
N/A
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Phocas Business Intelligence
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Phocas Business Intelligence
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Phocas has built its business model on exceeding customer expectations.
We’ve operated on a subscription basis from the start and in the words of Phocas Group chairman and co-founder Paul Magee: ‘That puts the onus on us to perform’. And we like that. In fact, our whole company ecosystem is built around that ‘light bulb moment’ when customers achieve a breakthrough by seeing their business through fresh eyes.
More Pricing Information
Features
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
Phocas Business Intelligence
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
8.5
18 Ratings
1% above category average
Phocas Business Intelligence
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
7.5
18 Ratings
8% below category average
Phocas Business Intelligence
-
Ratings
Simple transformations
8.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Complex transformations
7.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
8.2
18 Ratings
3% above category average
Phocas Business Intelligence
-
Ratings
Data model creation
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Metadata management
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
6.116 Ratings
00 Ratings
Testing and debugging
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
9.0
15 Ratings
11% above category average
Phocas Business Intelligence
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools
9.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
-
Ratings
Phocas Business Intelligence
9.0
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
-
Ratings
Phocas Business Intelligence
9.6
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
Feature
Informatica PowerCenter (legacy)
-
Ratings
Phocas Business Intelligence
9.3
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) and Phocas Business Intelligence
1.- Scenaries with poor sources of data is not recomended (Very bad ROI). The solution is for medium-big enterprises with a lot of sources of data and users. 2.- Bank and finance enviroment to integrate differente data form trading, Regulatory reports, decisions makers, fraud and financial crimes because in this kind of scenary the quality of data is the base of the business. 3.- Departments of development and test of applications in enterprises because you can design enviroments, out of the production systems, to development and test the new API's or updateds made.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you would like your data in one place with easy access, this is the software for you. You can have data from multiple systems and bring it into one view so that you have a quick and easily visible dashboard for the data you wish to see.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Informatica Powercenter is an innovative software that works with ETL-type data integration. Connectivity to almost all the database systems.
Great documentation and customer support.
It has a various solution to address data quality issues. data masking, data virtualization. It has various supporting tools or MDM, IDQ, Analyst, BigData which can be used to analyze data and correct it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There are too many ways to perform the same or similar functions which in turn makes it challenging to trace what a workflow is doing and at which point (ex. sessions can be designed as static or re-usable and the override can occur at the session or workflow, or both which can be counter productive and confusing when troubleshooting).
The power in structured design is a double edged sword. Simple tasks for a POC can become cumbersome. Ex. if you want to move some data to test a process, you first have to create your sources by importing them which means an ODBC connection or similar will need to be configured, you in turn have to develop your targets and all of the essential building blocks before being able to begin actual development. While I am on sources and targets, I think of a table definition as just that and find it counter intuitive to have to design a table as both a source and target and manage them as different objects. It would be more intuitive to have a table definition and its source/target properties defined by where you drag and drop it in the mapping.
There are no checkpoints or data viewer type functions without designing an entire mapping and workflow. If you would like to simply run a job up to a point and check the throughput, an entire mapping needs to be completed and you would workaround this by creating a flat file target.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Positives; - Multi User Development Environment - Speed of transformation - Seamless integration between other Informatica products. Negatives; - There should be less windows to maintain developers' focus while using. You probably need 2 big monitors when you start development with Informatica Power Center. - Oracle Analytical functions should be natively used. - E-LT support as well as ETL support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a very user-friendly product and is easy to understand. You can get your data from just a quick click and the dashboard loads. You can take the data and drill down easy to find what you are looking for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PowerCenter is robust and fast, and it does a great job meeting all the needs, not just the most commercially vocal needs. In the hands of an expert power user, you can accomplish almost anything with your data. It is not for new users or intermittent users-- for that the Cloud version is a better fit. Be prepared for costly connectors (priced differently for each source or destination you are working with), and just be planful of your projects so you are not paying for connectors you no longer need or want
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Informatica power center is a leader of the pack of ETL tools and has some great abilities that make it stand out from other ETL tools. It has been a great partner to its clients over a long time so it's definitely dependable. With all the great things about Informatica, it has a bit of tech burden that should be addressed to make it more nimble, reduce the learning curve for new developers, provide better connectivity with visualization tools.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While Talend offers a much more comfortable interface to work with, Informatica's forte is performance. And on that front, Informatica Enterprise Data Integration certainly leaves Talend in the dust. For a more back-end-centric use case, Informatica is certainly the ETL tool of choice. On the other hand, if business users would be using the tool, then Talend would be the preferred tool.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The data pipeline automation capability of Informatica means that few resources are needed to pre-process the data that ultimately resides in a Data Warehouse. Once a workflow is implemented, manual intervention is not needed.
PowerCenter did require more resources and time for installation and configuration than was expected/planned for.
The lack of or minimal support of unstructured data means that newer sources of dynamic/changing data cannot be easily processed/transformed through PowerCenter workflows.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info