TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Innocentive

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Scoro

    Score8 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    Scoro is a professional services automation (PSA) software purpose-built for consultancies, agencies, IT firms, architecture companies, and other professional services businesses. It unites projects, resources, and finances in one system, combining functionality for planning, tracking, and billing. Features include: - CRM & pipeline – A complete overview of a sales funnel and upcoming…

    $23.90

    per month per user

    Pricing
    InnocentiveScoro
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Core
    $23.90
    per month per user
    Growth
    $38.90
    per month per user
    Performance
    $59.90
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    InnocentiveScoro
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Up to a 16% discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    InnocentiveScoro
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Autotask PSA
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Workday Professional Services Automation
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Planview AdaptiveWork
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    InnocentiveScoro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    4.1
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    InnocentiveScoro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Innocentive
    I believe that Innocentive is well suited for people who have skills in any of the following areas: computer science, advanced healthcare, sociology, business management and any kind of engineering. The projects that can be solved through Innocentive need to be new ideas for these companies and need to be detailed. Also, I have found that project proposals need to be detailed enough so that the end user knows exactly what needs to be done to solve their solution, and that it is ok to go over the 3-5 page length. One of my proposals that was accepted was 20 pages in length but had to include the details such as screen mockups, server analysis, etc in order for the company to be able to successfully implement my solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    Scoro would be ideal for a larger business who is truly interested in developing a stronger and more efficient workflow. I honestly would have recommended it had it not been for the cost, the hidden fees, and the fact that I'd have to upgrade to an even more expensive plan if I wanted to get the most of the program for our level. We only needed one item, so would have ended up paying much more to not use a great deal of additional features. So, if you want to increase your workflow and have the funds, use them - absolutely. You will not regret it. But I cannot recommend it to someone who is on a tight budget
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Innocentive
    • Innocentive is very responsive to answering questions that are asked through their platform. In my experience they have replied within 24 hours and their responses were descriptive and thoughtful. Being able to have an answer to your question quickly when you are working on a project is imperative, especially when there is a deadline for the project.
    • If your project proposal is accepted by the end user through Innocentive, Innocentive assigns you a point person through the exit process and that person was extremely helpful in providing me the documentation that is necessary for the exit process as well as how the payment will be distributed and when. The entire process was transparent and I never encountered any issues or frustrations while working with Innocentive.
    • Innocentive provides email communication about new projects that are posted through their site, as it pertains to your strengths and skills. A lot of times I have valued the email communication because it got me interested in a project that I would normally not search for or consider.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    • Great interface and user experience
    • Fast, informative and compact platform
    • Great invoicing and reminders system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Innocentive
    • I think that Innocentive could add a few more FAQ's to their list, such as when exactly a solver's profile will be updated with the 'solver' status. I did not realize it wouldn't be until the payment was sent out to me as opposed to when my project proposal was accepted.
    • I also think that Innocentive could add information about the duration of time it takes between having your project proposal accepted and actually receiving payment as well as what documentation is needed to be signed, notarized and sent back to them after your project is accepted.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    • Cost. I ended up not recommending this product simply because of the cost alone. There are hidden costs you will not know about until it is too late. Their pricing model is geared for bigger businesses, and can cripple smaller ones. The pricing is by user. If you get the most basic of plans (with a 900 onboarding charge), you will realize that all the things you actually need to make the program effective are on the next tier up...
    • Quickbooks. At the time I was exploring this, Quickbooks was not very well integrated. If you wanted to include billing (which they do show promise for), then you will have issues here.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Innocentive
    I will certainly continue to use Innocentive, not just because it is easy to use but because it provides a challenge for me on a personal level as well as provides me opportunities within the solver's network. I could also use Innocentive in the future from an RFP perspective by leveraging this great group of innovation experts to help me find a solution to a problem from my own company. Without Innocentive, you are stuck implementing solutions from inside a box but when you are able to leverage Innocentive, your box opens up to the entire world and I guarantee that you will receive a solution to a problem that you never thought of before!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Innocentive
    There are other similar products such as BrightIdea.com and CrowdSource.com, but I have found that Innocentive was far easier to use (has a very user-friendly interface), has the ability for the user to contact anyone else within the Innocentive network, and allows users to work on a solution by forming a team with other Innocentive solvers. Additionally, I selected Innocentive because it was endorsed by my university which I trusted because I knew that it was already vetted by them and proved to be a trustworthy company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    We prefer Scoro as it's faster and easier to use and learn. Also the fee structure makes a lot of sense for a smaller company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Innocentive
    • Since I have used this through my MBA program as well as on a personal level, I have seen greater self improvement and motivation with my work within my company. I also read other solver's solutions which allows me to understand how the winning solution solved the problem which helps me to think in different ways when it comes time to create new innovative solutions for my own company.
    • I think that projects that are solved through Innocentive definitely have a faster lead time, especially for areas in which a company does not have a lot of expertise (i.e. computer engineering or product engineering). Innocentive has thousands of experts in various fields across the globe, and hundreds of these experts may be working on their own solution for any given project, so any company willing to post their RFP through Innocentive will receive the largest, most varied, and most professional solutions that they would never be able to receive through a traditional company model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scoro
    • Scoro could have had a wonderful impact on the workflow of the business. It allows for integrations most programs don't, including accounting and time tracking, and could have easily eliminated the need for an FTE through the streamlining of tasks alone.
    • If we had implemented this program, we would have saved time, but all of the gains would have gone to pay for Scoro. It would not have balanced out, especially if they ever were to raise their rates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Scoro Screenshots

    Screenshot of an example of the customizable real-time dashboards that provide an overview of progress across the business, and monitor KPIs and key metricsScreenshot of a dynamic Gantt chart for planning, allocating resources based on availability, and monitoring project performance in real time in terms of time and moneyScreenshot of a monitor of cost burn, used to forecast profit while the projects are ongoing to detect signs of overservicing early enough to do something about itScreenshot of where to track billable and non-billable utilization across the team to understand how resource utilization, and how much time is spent on revenue-generating workScreenshot of where Scoro forecasts revenue automatically based on pipeline and committed projects, to support smarter and more strategic business decisions that support growthScreenshot of the accounting tools Scoro can integrate with to sync bills, invoices, and payments automatically, reducing manual work and minimizing the risk of human error