Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.N/A
IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
IntSights is an all-in-one external threat intelligence and protection platform, purpose-built to neutralize threats outside the wire. According to the vendor, it is the only solution of its kind. IntSights solution suite's goal is to equip cybersecurity teams worldwide to more effectively detect, assess, and mitigate threats externally from the source, well-before before they reach the perimeter. IntSights four core offerings are: Threat Command™ Threat Intelligence…N/A
Pricing
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsPriced by company size
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Features
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
7.2
6 Ratings
0% below category average
IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
-
Ratings
Infection Remediation7.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
7.8
10 Ratings
8% above category average
IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
-
Ratings
Network Analytics7.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting8.210 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Small Businesses
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
Score 7.9 out of 10
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
Score 7.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(18 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(18 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
Read full review
Rapid7
It has been a brilliant tool and we have harnessed it for so many applications - Threat intelligence, Risk Analysis, Automation, Endpoint protection, Vulnerability Management, Application Security, Protecting all our Cloud Applications. We love the fact that we only have to see those threats that are meaningful to us.
We don't need clutter and endless dashboards with information that just gets in the way and makes things complicated. By having this full, crisp, easily discernible visibility, our decision-making is enhanced and we can see clearly what's happening in real time. We also love the fact that if a dashboard isn't proving to be productive, then we can go ahead and scrap it, and create another one. The tailor made/bespoke aspect of the Application is the thing that really sets it
apart. By having all our dashboards aligned, our teams are all working from the same page and it means we are safe in the knowledge that our systems and applications are being monitored in the most effective and efficient ways.
There haven't been any real scenarios where it has been ineffective. - perhaps just In-depth Risk Vulnerability Analytics
are a bit lacking. However, I'm probably just picking hairs there.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • accelerated threat response feature, prioritizing threats according to requirement.
  • Optimization of the threat intelligence , and can be integrated with 3rd party tools.
  • Features like - Breach ,Adversary, Machine and Operational Intelligence.
  • Mandiant dynamic host and the malware views along with indicators.
Read full review
Rapid7
No answers on this topic
Cons
Google
  • Paywalls exist throughout the data set and can halt an investigation without the right model
  • Some data was incomplete or broken up between pay tiers
  • Navigation through the data lacked a definitive trail or breadcrumbs to retrace steps during investigations
Read full review
Rapid7
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
Read full review
Rapid7
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
Read full review
Rapid7
IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7 was by far the clear winner, in terms of seamless integration with our exisitng systems, deployment, cleaner User Interface, ease of operation, better for monitoring Indicators of compromise and dark web information, having more features etc.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Improved incident response time
  • Specific investigations that have reduced the attack surface
  • Technical reports on threats not controlled by the bank's local team
Read full review
Rapid7
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots

Screenshot of Mandiant Advantage DashboardScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor DetailsScreenshot of Mandiant Advantage Actor Graph

IntSights Cyber Intelligence, from Rapid7 Screenshots

Screenshot of Main dashboard view of IntSights Threat Command™Screenshot of View of automated threat alerts, tailored to the enterprise client's digital footprint and assets.Screenshot of The Investigation module within IntSights Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) for customer users to conduct external threat mapping with an intuitive interface for rapid pivoting.Screenshot of Logos of IntSights' Technology Alliance Partners (TAPs) with easy-to-deploy technical integrations.