Foxit PDF SDK vs. jPDFWeb
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Foxit PDF SDK | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Foxit PDF SDK offers high performance pdf libraries to help developers build pdf technology. According to the vendor, key features include: Render PDFs: High performance PDF libraries to render PDF pages, page objects, annotations, and forms the way they were intended to be viewed: sharp, clear, accurate, and easy to read. Allows applications to view, zoom in, zoom out, and print PDF documents and forms. Reflow: PDF is a fixed-layout flat document format, it cannot… | $3,000 per platform/per year |
jPDFWeb | N/A | N/A | jPDFWeb is a Java library to convert PDF documents to SVG / HTML5. The library can save to the local file system or to an output stream to be able to serve the document directly to a client browser when working within a J2EE server. jPDFWeb is built on top of Qoppa’s proprietary PDF technology so you do not have to install any third party software or drivers. Since it is written in Java, it allows your application to remain platform independent and run on Windows, Linux, Unix (Solaris,… | N/A |
| Foxit PDF SDK | jPDFWeb | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Foxit PDF SDK | jPDFWeb | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
81% Would buy again 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 16 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Foxit PDF SDK | jPDFWeb | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Tungsten Power PDF Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | PDF Xchange Viewer and Editor Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Adobe Acrobat Reader Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Foxit PDF SDK | jPDFWeb | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.9 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Performance | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 7.0 | - |
| Foxit PDF SDK | jPDFWeb | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Foxit PDF SDK Screenshots | jPDFWeb Screenshots |












