Eggplant, from Keysight vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Eggplant, from Keysight
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Eggplant Test Automation Suite, now from Keysight since the June 2020 acquisition, provides user-centric performance and load testing designed as simple to use, and able to simulate virtual users at both the application UI and the network protocol levels so the user gains a true understanding of the UX impact at scale.N/A
Tricentis NeoLoad
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.
$20,000
per year with 300 virtual users
Pricing
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Small Businesses
TestComplete
TestComplete
Score 8.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(14 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Eggplant, from KeysightTricentis NeoLoad
Likelihood to Recommend
Keysight Technologies
I would definitely recommend [Eggplant Performance] as an automation and testing software. Outside of these capabilities there are other tools that are better.
Read full review
Tricentis
Here are some specific scenarios where Tricentis NeoLoad might be well-suited:
  • Performance testing of web applications: Tricentis NeoLoad is well-suited for testing the performance of web applications under heavy loads. It can simulate multiple users accessing the application simultaneously and measure response times, throughput, and error rates to identify bottlenecks and potential failure points.
  • Testing the scalability of APIs: Tricentis NeoLoad is well-suited for testing the scalability of APIs. It can simulate increasing loads on an API and measure the response times and error rates to identify the point at which performance starts to degrade.
  • Identifying performance bottlenecks: Tricentis NeoLoad can be used to identify performance bottlenecks in web applications and APIs by measuring response times, throughput, and error rates at various points in the application. This can help organizations pinpoint the specific parts of their applications that are causing performance issues and take steps to address them.
Here are some scenarios where Tricentis NeoLoad might be less appropriate:
  • Testing the performance of native mobile applications: Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily focused on testing the performance of web applications and APIs. It does not have as much support for testing the performance of native mobile applications.
  • Testing the performance of applications hosted in the cloud: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have as much support for testing the performance of applications hosted in the cloud. It may be less well-suited for testing the performance of cloud-based applications and infrastructure.
  • Advanced scripting and customization: While Tricentis NeoLoad does offer some scripting and customization capabilities, it is not as well-suited for users who need more advanced options for customizing and automating load testing scenarios.
Read full review
Pros
Keysight Technologies
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
  • NeoLoad supports performance test engineers with a strong feature set to analyse the results. The first metric you have in mind is response time of the application. The metric satisfies the stakeholder if it meets the requirements. Otherwise, the stakeholder wants to know some comments and suggestions for improvement. I rely on the data gathered by monitoring agents when I analyse test results. The monitoring agent is a service which collects different counters from an operating system, databases, web server, etc. The results can be analysed in individual composed graphs. This is a powerful feature to deliver conclusive reports to stakeholders. Even the export of reports in various formats is helpful for communication with different stakeholders.
  • Our customers like the flexible license model of NeoLoad. A usual performance test project starts with the development of tests and configuration of the test environment. Finally, there is a first test execution followed by a couple of additional test executions. Usually, it is hard to say how long it takes to implement the issues based on the test results. So we usually do not know how long is the period between first and last test execution. It does not matter how long the period might be. In most of our projects we prefer daily licenses of NeoLoad. If you buy e.g. a four-day license you can use NeoLoad at four different days.
  • As a performance test engineer, I like the impressive APIs of NeoLoad. NeoLoad is just a performance test tool and the vendor Neotys is focused on this job. Whenever you would like to add something into a test scenario which is not mainly a performance issue you can integrate these parts by APIs which are easy to handle and very powerful. They also support you in case technologies which are not supported yet by NeoLoad. Maybe there is a new device which you want to monitor. Therefore you can report the measurements of the specific counters by the data exchange API during test execution. So you can analyse the data in the usual way. In our company we developed already a couple of features based on the APIs of NeoLoad and we are very happy with this flexibility.
Read full review
Cons
Keysight Technologies
  • Installing and setting up initially could be easier
  • Reporting tool can be improved
  • Fails at times
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Integration with third-party tools. I cannot stream NL test data to a third-party DB and then plot graphs out of it.
  • Keyboard shortcuts. It is tedious to use the mouse to click everywhere. I'd love to have some keyboard shortcuts
  • Reports and Analytics. Lacks intelligence in identifying patterns of problems
Read full review
Usability
Keysight Technologies
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
In being flexible to meet all needs, it is very bare bones by design, but this could be a considered a feature and not a bug.
Read full review
Support Rating
Keysight Technologies
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
Immediate response and help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Keysight Technologies
I have not used another tool exactly like this because Eggplant is awesome and we do not need another.
Read full review
Tricentis
We used Jenkins for manual performance testing and had big efforts to script and evaluate the test results. Furthermore, the effort of maintaining and editing the scripts was very high. To generate a report, many tables must be analyzed. The efforts of these tasks are minimized since we used the great tool NeoLoad.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Keysight Technologies
  • Very easy
  • Customer support very helpful
  • Saves us a lot of time
  • Helps us put out better products
Read full review
Tricentis
  • Neoload solves a test based web sockets & supporting the desire for later hurdle faced by user.
  • User can prove throughput & find limitations before going into production.
  • Overall; its pleasant to see the outcome provided by Neoload for business development tools in most of all manners.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots

Screenshot of Code-less design — loops, conditions, and other drag and drop controls simplify test design creation, and JavaScript can still be used for extremely advanced cases.Screenshot of CI/CD integrations — collaborate across dev, QA, operations, and business teams to create a standardized performance testing approach throughout the enterprise.Screenshot of Real-time test results — analyze test results live to react to an anomaly before the test is over. And leverage in-depth test reporting when the test is completed.Screenshot of Collaborate on test result as the test is runningScreenshot of Configure SaaS-based performance testScreenshot of Dashboard for team analysis