Kickbox vs. Mailcheck.co

I haven't used many other email validation products before, only a couple of 'free' cloud-based options with limited list size capability. Kickbox is super professional, easy to use, and works.

Incentivized

Well suited scenario: - Easy and clean design - Great email validation quality and speed - Amazing API can be installed on any website form - Nimble support Less appropriate scenario: - Hard to define, the only thing, I believe they need to add more integrations.

• Finding misspelled emails
• Including domain name in Excel output that is produced
• Easy to use software

Incentivized

• Email validation
• Simplicity
• Logically built UX/UI
• Powerful API

• Catching spam traps
• Too many emails in "unknown" category when cleaning B2B emails
• More accurate cleaning overall

Incentivized

• I think more integrations would be good

I like Kickbox output files better as it includes the "domain". Overall, both softwares could do a better job cleaning lists. Kickbox shows more "unknown" emails where are BriteVerify shows less "unknown emails" but then more bad emails end up in the valid list. Kickbox has a higher threshold to put emails in "unknown".

Incentivized

I've been using this service for quite some time, and then I was receiving more bounces than expected. I decided to try solutions like Mailcheck.co and couldn't be more right to choose them, very happy with Mailcheck.

• Our servers are in great reputation

Incentivized

• Increased lead response
• Helped me to hit the target
• 115% increase in sales