Kisslicer vs. Onshape
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kisslicer | N/A | N/A | KISSlicer has come a long way from the initial command line release ("Three settings should be enough for anybody!"). Targeting precision and focusing on the technical aspects of 3D printing has kept KISSlicer adding features and options to keep up with a wide variety of printer types, print styles, and mesh topologies, all while gracefully handling new and more demanding materials. | N/A |
Onshape | Score6.4 out of 10 | N/A | Onshape is a cloud-native product development platform with integrated CAD, data management and analytics. Onshape aims to accelerate time to market and improve innovation by: 1) Access: Unlike file-based CAD which is on-premise only, Onshape enables remote access for designers and engineers from anywhere, and on any internet-connected device -including tablets and smart phones. 2) Collaboration: Onshape aims to eliminate the version control problems and blocking of file-based… | $1,500 per year per user |
| Kisslicer | Onshape | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | No dedicated hardware is required. Works on all web-connected devices including tablet, Chromebook, iPhone, Android. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Kisslicer | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 41 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 41 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 41 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 37 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 37 Answers | |
| Kisslicer | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Autodesk Inventor Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | DraftSight Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | PTC Creo Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Kisslicer | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.3 |
| Kisslicer | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |







