Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kualitee
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Kualitee is an all-in-one test management tool that supports manual and automated testing. With Kualitee, users can replace inefficient workflows and spreadsheets, and create and import test cases, execute test cases, log defects and perform defect management activities with a dedicated module. The dashboard provides insights into a project's health. Re-Usability of Test Cases: With Kualitee, users can save test cases as a template for later use. During regression testing, use…
$0
3 Users
PractiTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
TestRail
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.
$35
per month billed annually
Pricing
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Editions & Modules
Community
$0.00
3 Users
Silver
$45.00
10 Users
Gold
$200.00
10 Users
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Professional Cloud
$35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud
$38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud
$71
per month billed annually per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFor enterprise get in touch
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Considered Multiple Products
Kualitee
PractiTest

No answer on this topic

TestRail
Chose TestRail
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and …
Features
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Kualitee
6.5
1 Ratings
22% below category average
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
5% above category average
TestRail
7.5
3 Ratings
8% below category average
Centralized test management7.01 Ratings9.24 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Map tests to user stories6.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Test execution reporting7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings8.23 Ratings
Defect management6.01 Ratings8.03 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KualiteePractiTestTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
Kualitatem
From a business standpoint, features such as test scenarios, test cases, bug logging, and then graphical representations of every minute detail related to task and projects are very satisfying and productive. We can keep track of literally everything with Kualitee, and our quality is improving. One downside is that we cannot change the visualisations of some graphs. I believe that by giving the user more customisation options, such as filtering out on the basis of days and months, the experience could be greatly improved.
Read full review
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
Read full review
Pros
Kualitatem
  • Import and Export
  • Integration with other tools
  • Regression and Blackbox testing
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • Managing test plans and test cases
  • Generation of test results
  • Modularised way of storing tests
Read full review
Cons
Kualitatem
  • Support response time
  • Should have dark mode
  • Response time for API call
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • Outstanding user bugs
  • UI is clunky
  • Things are not where you think they would be
Read full review
Usability
Kualitatem
No answers on this topic
PractiTest
No answers on this topic
Idera, Inc.
As I am a tester, for me I found this tool to be new in terms of everything like the management of tests, plans, releases, reporting,etc. It is overall a good tool for test reporting and can be used for reference in the future. I liked several features of on the go placement of screenshots. Also I feel like the UI , the font, the color combination can be improved
Read full review
Support Rating
Kualitatem
No answers on this topic
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Kualitatem
TestRail is very costly and complex compared to Kualitee
Read full review
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Kualitatem
  • If the terminology ( Test Scenarios, modules, components ) is not used in your workflow, it may take some time to set up properly because you must figure out how these are defined by your own terminology to get the hierarchy correct
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
Idera, Inc.
  • We are able to easily pull reports any time management would like to see them
  • Jira integration makes it easy to attach to stories/defects and save time
  • A quick overview at the system's health as a whole is easy to see from TestRail
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kualitee Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of