Kyriba vs. Lusis TANGO
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kyriba | Score8.4 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Kyriba empowers CFOs, Treasurers and their IT counterparts to transform liquidity as a dynamic, real-time vehicle for growth and value creation. Kyriba is a secure, scalable SaaS platform that leverages artificial intelligence, automates payments workflows, and enables thousands of multinational corporations and banks to maximize growth, protect against loss from fraud and financial risk and reduce operational costs. Kyriba states that for… | N/A |
Lusis TANGO | N/A | N/A | Lusis Payments is a software and services provider to the global retail payments industry headquartered in Paris. Lusis TANGO is a micro-service transaction paltform built on a micro-services architecture providing agile delivery for business. The collection of autonomous services work together to provide a global service and can be developed separately and deployed and run independently. The vendor states its CBSD approach leads to reduced development and maintenance costs which provides faster… | N/A |
| Kyriba | Lusis TANGO | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Kyriba | Lusis TANGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 17 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 19 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Kyriba | Lusis TANGO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kyriba | Lusis TANGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.3 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Kyriba | Lusis TANGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Kyriba Screenshots |











