Kyriba Treasury Management System
Overall Satisfaction with Kyriba
Bank Balance and Transaction reporting, FX & cash mgmt, long term debt, bank guarantees, cash forecasting, investments, and their supporting accounting modules.
Pros
- Clean, clear UI with user customizable workflows.
- Robust feature set and abundant options to configure modules.
- Integration with ERPs, FX trading platforms, investment portals
- Excel API. The ability to press a button and sync reports/data with Kyriba allows for a lot of flexibility in reporting.
- The analytics module, while "extra" offers a strong offering for native visualization capabilities.
Cons
- Pricing. Transparency (itemized pricing wasn't offered us), strong premium against peers, and every little thing is an added cost (EG they bill per user, per module).
- All Treasury data in one place. From automated flows reporting in from financial institutions to storing our contracts - all of our information is in one system, logically stored.
- Excel API - further lets us access all that data to run analytics very quickly. Especially when evaluating something new - this is a gamechanger. Longer term solutions like their platform analytics or external visualization tools can be transitioned to after initial mockup.
- Workflows allow for clear configuration of process allowing us to maintain process integrity and simplify throughout the org.
I've had experience with FIS Quantum, Integrity and WSS. Kyriba is much simpler to navigate while still offering a full feature set.
Do you think Kyriba delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Kyriba's feature set?
Yes
Did Kyriba live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Kyriba go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Kyriba again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation