Kyriba Treasury Management System
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- Clean, clear UI with user customizable workflows.
- Robust feature set and abundant options to configure modules.
- Integration with ERPs, FX trading platforms, investment portals
- Excel API. The ability to press a button and sync reports/data with Kyriba allows for a lot of flexibility in reporting.
- The analytics module, while "extra" offers a strong offering for native visualization capabilities.
Cons
- Pricing. Transparency (itemized pricing wasn't offered us), strong premium against peers, and every little thing is an added cost (EG they bill per user, per module).
Return on Investment
- All Treasury data in one place. From automated flows reporting in from financial institutions to storing our contracts - all of our information is in one system, logically stored.
- Excel API - further lets us access all that data to run analytics very quickly. Especially when evaluating something new - this is a gamechanger. Longer term solutions like their platform analytics or external visualization tools can be transitioned to after initial mockup.
- Workflows allow for clear configuration of process allowing us to maintain process integrity and simplify throughout the org.










