Laravel PHP Framework vs. OpenText Web CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Laravel PHP Framework
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Laravel is a free, open source web application PHP framework.N/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Pricing
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Features
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
API00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings7.26 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.87 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings7.76 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Laravel PHP Framework
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.97 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.27 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings7.57 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Small Businesses
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Symfony
Symfony
Score 10.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(17 ratings)
7.4
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Laravel PHP FrameworkOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
I would say that Laravel is not a suitable framework for high-frequency, high-volume, real-time interaction or processing millions of records in batch operations. It shines for standard database web applications (CRUD, Admin Panels, etc.) and is a fantastic multi-developer framework.
Read full review
OpenText
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Laravel utilizes the best possible PHP standards and coding practices.
  • Laravel uses many widely-accepted community libraries and builds upon them, rather than re-inventing everything.
  • Laravel has many components available from the community and is extremely easy to build custom components for, either with custom code or by integrating existing third-party PHP libraries.
  • Laravel is flexible enough to power pretty much any kind of application I can imagine.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
  • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Laravel is updated regularly, which is great. However, in order to get the latest features, use the newest 3rd party libraries, have the most current security updates, and ensure that the newest features of PHP are usable, you have to continuously upgrade your Laravel application. This costs time and money, obviously, and if you don't stay on top of the updates you will quickly fall behind. This is the case with any open source software, but it needs to be considered for any team considering using Laravel or any other software.
  • Because of the size of the Laravel community, there are a LOT of 3rd party libraries. Some of these are great, some are less than great. Sometimes it's difficult to evaluate the quality of a library, making it difficult to trust many libraries. Developers need to be cautious and thoughtful when considering using new software.
  • Because of the rapid development of the Laravel framework, the size of the community, and the simplicity of being able to publish content online - it is very easy to find documentation, tutorials, or other "advice" that is not up to date, or that has outdated information.
Read full review
OpenText
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
Laravel PHP Framework has continued to exceed my expectations. It supported me in the development of a high quality and stable web application that is mission critical for the organization. I cannot imagine wanting to use any other tool for web development. Documentation, unit tests, and numerous integration options make using Laravel PHP Framework a natural choice.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Usability
Open Source
As I mentioned earlier Laravel PHP Framework has lot of in built feature as well as there is vast set of packages available to add the features in your application. It has very large community who can help when you feel stuck somewhere. This is why this rating is justified.
Read full review
OpenText
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
Supporting unit testing is bigger plus point in Laravel than any other framework. Developing with Laravel is much easier. Other frameworks have value in market, but Laravel has taken the lead in popularity among PHP developers in recent years. The large community supports you if you have problems. Using Laravel, integration became easy with third-party libraries, but it was costly too.
Read full review
OpenText
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Open Source
No answers on this topic
OpenText
The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Positive: Our delivery time for PHP application is faster than usual.
  • Positive: Developers are happy and they write better code with their usual development tools. No tool-upgrade necessary.
  • Negative: Initial delivery took 6 months extra and had to rewrite project several times.
Read full review
OpenText
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
ScreenShots