Clio Draft vs. Windward Core

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Clio Draft
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Clio Draft (formerly Lawyaw) is a legal document automation solution, offering access to cloud-based fillable court forms, and the ability to turn Microsoft Word documents into fillable templates.
$70
per month per user
Windward Core
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Windward’s low-code document generation solution embeds into any application, enabling users to populate data-smart documents within the familiar landscape of Microsoft Office. It's a solution from PDFTron since the April 2021 acquisition.
$190
per month
Pricing
Clio DraftWindward Core
Editions & Modules
Cloud-Based Court Forms
$70
per month 1 seat
Intelligent Document Automation
$110
per month 1 seat
PDF Court Form & Document Automation
$150.00
per month 1 seat
Windward Hub Standard
$19.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Hub Premium
$49.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Core Pro
$547.00
per month*
Windward Core Flex
$605.00
per month*
Windward Hub Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Clio DraftWindward Core
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$30/mo for each additional user. Discounted annual pricing is available.*Pay annually: 15% discount 10% discount for quarterly payment of Windward Core.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Clio DraftWindward Core
Best Alternatives
Clio DraftWindward Core
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.6 out of 10
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.1 out of 10
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Clio DraftWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(25 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Clio DraftWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
Clio
Well suited for any law office that uses any court forms. Also, it's great for any law office that needs signatures on any docs. The template features are excellent and a huge plus because any document can become a template in LawYaw. Probably not needed in a law office that only provides consulting or legal advice, but doesn't actually prepare any documents for clients.
Read full review
Apryse
Great for Technical Users. It's great for people a bit more on the technical side. It allows developers to quickly create and modify reporting templates without having to modify source code or make updates to a repository. Potentially Difficult for Non-Technical Users. Making substantial changes to the data portions of reporting can be a bit difficult for non-technical users. While Windward's tools for this are great, it still requires an understanding of the database schema which not all users will have.
Read full review
Pros
Clio
  • Reduces scrivener's errors.
  • Saves time
Read full review
Apryse
  • Native Office output -- not nested tables and/or horrible RTF like other tools generate.
  • Ease of use -- once the data sources are set up, creating tables is as simple as drag and drop (okay, maybe not exactly that simple, but you can certainly create a table of data using drag and drop, then format it and manipulate it as needed).
  • Responsive developers and support -- when I've had questions, they've been addressed VERY quickly and professionally.
Read full review
Cons
Clio
  • Integrations with case management platforms, such as MyCase
  • Zapier integrations
Read full review
Apryse
  • It is hard to pick out the tags if they are mixed in with a block of text.
  • Using report variables in select statements causes the selection list of available fields to not show anything.
  • The color themes do not match the office selection and it feels very disconnected.
Read full review
Usability
Clio
No answers on this topic
Apryse
For the most part, the Windward report designer is intuitive for our users; but there are a few areas where it is less intuitive. In these cases, our users need to search Windwards support wiki site, or even contact their support technicians. This can also be due to the short time we've had Windward and our lack of knowledge.
Read full review
Support Rating
Clio
No answers on this topic
Apryse
Support is something they take pride in. Once an issue is raised, they are quick to respond and provide details on a fix. No complaints on support here.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Clio
Read full review
Apryse
We evaluated several other products to integrate with our new software, but Windward Studios was an obvious standout above the majority. Other applications required some level of software development knowledge and experience to create templates and a much steeper learning curve. After consideration of ease of use, as well as a cost-comparison between different products, Windward Studios was the most suitable product to meet our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Clio
  • It has been a huge time saver for everyone at our firm.
  • It's so easy to use that our staff actually enjoys using it.
  • Our ROI is almost incalculable because of all the features for the price.
Read full review
Apryse
  • As a fully integrated solution, the ROI is impacted when a client gets stickier with our solution because they see the benefit of Windward.
  • Support has been fantastic for our development team so that as we integrate the solutions we have a clear and clean design.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Clio Draft Screenshots

Screenshot of Document Automation | Template SetsScreenshot of Document Automation | Document ReviewScreenshot of Court Forms | PopulatedScreenshot of Court Forms | Client Info

Windward Core Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of