LightningCAD vs. Onshape
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LightningCAD | N/A | N/A | Integrating CAD functionality with CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) system logic, LightningCAD is a configurable solution designed for design and product configuration organizations. LightningCAD codifies business rules into a platform that facilitates standardized design and enforces end-to-end process specifications, allowing CAD Designers to focus on complex modeling tasks while sales teams perform on-site configuration or clients utilize self-service design… | N/A |
Onshape | Score6.4 out of 10 | N/A | Onshape is a cloud-native product development platform with integrated CAD, data management and analytics. Onshape aims to accelerate time to market and improve innovation by: 1) Access: Unlike file-based CAD which is on-premise only, Onshape enables remote access for designers and engineers from anywhere, and on any internet-connected device -including tablets and smart phones. 2) Collaboration: Onshape aims to eliminate the version control problems and blocking of file-based… | $1,500 per year per user |
| LightningCAD | Onshape | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | The price is dependant on the amount of customization required per application. The development is based on an iterative process, and there are two options for pricing. The first is a revenue-sharing structure, where users pay a percentage of their revenue from using the software per month. The second option is customization plus licensing. The user pays the customization fee upfront as development is happening and then simply pays a monthly licensing fee. | No dedicated hardware is required. Works on all web-connected devices including tablet, Chromebook, iPhone, Android. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LightningCAD | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 41 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 41 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 41 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 37 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 37 Answers | |
| LightningCAD | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Onshape Score6.4 out of 10 | Autodesk Inventor Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Onshape Score6.4 out of 10 | DraftSight Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | PTC Creo Score7.6 out of 10 | PTC Creo Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LightningCAD | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.3 |
| LightningCAD | Onshape | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | LightningCAD Screenshots |













