Lingo is a telephony and VoIP software solution from Lingo.
$15
per month
Phone.com
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Phone.com is a cloud based VoIP solution from the company of the same name in Newark, New Jersey, with video conferencing, business phone, and optional premium features (e.g. live receptionist). The company boasts 30,000 businesses as users of its cloud-based communication and collaboration solutions.
$12.99
per month
Pricing
Lingo
Phone.com
Editions & Modules
Small Team
$15
per month
Standard
$30
per month
Plus
$40
per month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
IP Phone Connection
$4.99
per month, per device
Phone Numbers
$4.99
per month
Call Recording
$7.99
per month
Basic Users
$12.99
per user, per month
Plus Users
$19.99
per user, per month
Pro Users
$29.99
per user, per month
Lice Receptionist
Starting at $90
per month
Global Phone Numbers
Starting at $4.99
per month
International Dialing
Vary Rates
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lingo
Phone.com
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
20% discount with annual billing. Mix and match user plans to create a custom plan appropriate for the business.
More Pricing Information
Features
Lingo
Phone.com
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Lingo and Phone.com
Feature
Lingo
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Phone.com
10.0
2 Ratings
23% above category average
User templates
8.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Hosted PBX
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Call reports
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Directory of employee names
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Lingo and Phone.com
Feature
Lingo
-
Ratings
Phone.com
10.0
2 Ratings
20% above category average
Answering rules
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Call recording
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Call park
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Call screening
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Message alerts
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Lingo and Phone.com
Feature
Lingo
-
Ratings
Phone.com
10.0
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Audio conferencing
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Instant messaging
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Lingo and Phone.com
Lingo is great for small to mid sized company working with big box retailers that want to manage EDI in a cost effective but also time efficient manner. If you are looking for complete automation and integration, or a highly developed interface this is not the EDI platofrm for you
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Phone.com is a no-brainer. The cost savings over a POTS or in-house PBX system are tremendous. The affordability added on top of the easy to use and deploy features make Phone.com the best choice. Phone.com is well-suited for situations where you need other-than-standard call holding, call routing, and other similar advanced call features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Cost setup for each retail partner is steep. In this digital age, it seems like a rip off to have to pay for this service
ERP/Warehouse integration - it does not have the ability to integrate with our ERP setup currently.
Sometimes there are just one too many steps to submit documents - wish it automatically prompted to the next submission step to remember to get through all steps more easily and not get lost in submitting documents
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Phone.com has been excellent with support and I can not think of any areas for improvement with regards to that
Phone.com could provide more graphical assistance when programming call routing. A visual indication of the flow of a call should be presented and would come in handy when planning out difficult ques/call routes
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We used SPS for a brief time because our warehouse had the capability to integrate with this program. It was very expensive and the interface for manually processing was not user friendly or easy to navigate. The integration was going to be an additional large cost. Lingo, while it does not have the integration capabilities, was the lower cost and easier to use option. We could get things done quickly for a lower cost and easily teach our third party warehouse to help in the process.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It was user friendly so we could have our warehouse take over helping us process ASNs and take over steps on processing EDI orders for no additional cost- this has saved our admin time needed for these orders
We were able to add all our retailer partners with specific requirements without issue. It helps us stream the processing and save time/money on these orders where the margins are not always great and the rules complicated
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info