LoadComplete vs. NetStorm

LoadComplete

NetStorm

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
LoadComplete	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.	$287 one-time fee
NetStorm	Score 8.7 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Cavisson’s NetStorm is a performance testing and capacity analysis appliance. It is a load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its technology handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. The vendor says NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues early in the application life cycle. Additionally, the vendor says what makes…	N/A

Pricing

LoadComplete

NetStorm

Editions & Modules

Subscription Starter: $239
per month 100 virtual users
On-demand Starter: $287
one-time fee 100 virtual users
Subscription Pro: $699
per month 1000 virtual users
On-demand Pro: $887
one-time fee 1000 virtual users
Subscription Premium: $899
per month 2500 virtual users
On-demand Premium: $1,139
one-time fee 2500 virtual users
Enterprise: Let's chat

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
LoadComplete	NetStorm
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

On-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.

To get started with NetStorm, email us at sales@cavisson.com

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	LoadComplete	NetStorm
Top Pros	Pro Load testing Pro Detailed reports Pro Easy to use	Pro Enterprise level Pro 24 7 Pro Performance monitoring
Top Cons	Minus Gather data Minus Rather slow Minus User to customize	Minus Hard to learn Minus User interface

Features

LoadComplete

NetStorm

Load Testing

Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
	LoadComplete 8.2 5 Ratings 3% below category average	NetStorm - Ratings
End to end performance management	8.45 Ratings	00 Ratings
Integrated performance data	9.54 Ratings	00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility	6.95 Ratings	00 Ratings
Real time monitoring	7.95 Ratings	00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection	8.44 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	LoadComplete	NetStorm
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 8.1 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	JMeter Score 8.5 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	LoadComplete	NetStorm
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (5 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	8.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	LoadComplete	NetStorm
Likelihood to Recommend	SmartBear If you are testing an application and you don't have experience in performance testing, this tool will help you to test the load with some documentation help. It's very easy to use. and if you have complex scenarios to determine the coding and adjusting graphs, the LoadComplete will not be a helpful tool for you. Incentivized MA Mohamed Atef Staff Software Quality Engineer Read full review	Cavisson Systems [NetStorm] is well suited for an enterprise use, we are smaller business and it is not as suitable but we still use it. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	SmartBear We have been using LoadComplete in the Tech Department. I usually use LoadComplete to test the speed and loads of several applications we develop in-house. Moreover, we have also used LoadComplete to create reports and at the same time report any issues that we notice during a certain load. It is an affordable platform. LoadComplete has a lot of good features which has made my life so much easier so there are many pros of this tool as well. It is quite easy to use and comes in very handy. Incentivized Kate Woodward Marketing Project Manager Read full review	Cavisson Systems No answers on this topic
Cons	SmartBear Slow when the size of tests increase Coding is not possible Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Cavisson Systems No answers on this topic
Usability	SmartBear Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Cavisson Systems No answers on this topic
Support Rating	SmartBear Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Cavisson Systems No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	SmartBear We chose loadcomplete because we already use SmartBear software for other automation solutions. Porting over test cases is easy and a user can have a test up and running within minutes. I do wish SmartBear would have better support and I haven't used any other testing tool in a while to make a comparison. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Cavisson Systems We have not really used any other products like this. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	SmartBear Many built-in features (like auto data correlation, load distributing etc) will save time for development. Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review	Cavisson Systems Helps with performance Easy load testing Saves time and money Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		NetStorm Screenshots